With Folsom’s game coming up against Grant...I thought of a unique scenario....and this goes for any team where the favored team is so superior on every level, that the game feels like it shouldn’t be played...
would it be disingenuous for Folsom or any similar team to not even play their starters (or just q1) out of respect for the other team if the gap is that big or should the team play their starters to the end of the first half and then play second string?
i have a lot of respect for grant and their old coach A...and it is very sad to see the team tumble to where it has...but if folsom plays their starters to end of q2...i expect it to be more than a shellacking than even the 40 - 0 halftime lead vs OR was. Is that really fair to Grant? Imagine DLS playing Dublin (do they have a team) or playing Nevada Union.
would it be disingenuous for Folsom or any similar team to not even play their starters (or just q1) out of respect for the other team if the gap is that big or should the team play their starters to the end of the first half and then play second string?
i have a lot of respect for grant and their old coach A...and it is very sad to see the team tumble to where it has...but if folsom plays their starters to end of q2...i expect it to be more than a shellacking than even the 40 - 0 halftime lead vs OR was. Is that really fair to Grant? Imagine DLS playing Dublin (do they have a team) or playing Nevada Union.