March 2 Scores
- Thread starter Streak One
- Start date
Menlo 48
Shasta 38
It was Menlo's pressure that was the difference. Sat in a high 2-3 and Shasta couldn't hit their shots
Shasta 38
It was Menlo's pressure that was the difference. Sat in a high 2-3 and Shasta couldn't hit their shots
WTF???
The shot is either good and a 3 for the game winner or the shot was no good because time ran out....either way game over.
Giving the team 2 is a complete choke job screw up by the refs.
I thought Clovis was the better team.
Clovis' 2 guards #22 and #24 were too much to handle tonight. Just too slick.
Clovis was all class...staff and girls... good luck with SMS on saturday!
I’m baffled. Make a 1/2 court shot sure let’s say it’s a 2.
What should be the ruling in a situation like this. There is no shot clock to tell if the shot was released in time. Yet no one can say it wasn't. I think they just compromised and gave them a two and a chance to win in over time. I don't know what the ruling should have been in a situation like that.
I do rememember a college game between Duke and ND in Jamaica where they did not have a shot clock visible and it was obvious that ND took much more time than was left at the time out and scored and they were given the win. It appeared in that case if no visible shot clock the offense gets the benefit of the doubt. When you count the seconds off the tape it appears they might have gotten it off in time. They could have gone back and timed the shot of the video and decided it one way or the other. That would have been the best way to go.
Similar threads
