Don't give the trophy coaches. I'm talking if he or she had the bad news bears they could do something with them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't give the trophy coaches. I'm talking if he or she had the bad news bears they could do something with them[/QUOTE
What is coaching really all about? Is it just ego and big boss coach or a players coach?
What are you looking for?
What criterion are we going by? Here are 4 or 5 things I look for in a high school coach.......
See my updated comments below.
@Paytc
That was a great answer and I totally agree with you. But you didn't say in your opinion who you think that is.
I think it's very hard to pick one because the goals of high school sports are not nearly as clear as those in the pros. For example, a strong case could be made that Bill Belichek is the best coach in the NFL, as he's won the most titles, but he's pushed the boundaries of the rules and what he demands of his staff and players would not fly at the high school level.
As I've mentioned before, going 10-16 with a mediocre team against average opposition might indicate the best coaching job in the area (if wins and losses are the criterion), or so could going 31-3 with a ton of talent and a national schedule.
Paytc breaks it down in terms of relations with players, and that's the most important part, really, as high school coaching is really teaching. Do your players/students learn about the game, about themselves and a little about life, and will they look back and say "I'm really glad I played high school basketball"? If so, the wins and losses are irrelevant.
Great point, Clay. While the ultimate goal is to win a state championship, You, me, and all the readers on here know that there's 1 open championship and 5-6 state champions in CA. Winning a state championship is a remarkable feat at any level, but does that mean the best coach is the one that led his/her team to that championship? I've been a huge advocate at not entirely looking at the end result, but looking at what coaches have to work with and how the team develops over the course of the season.
Which of these coaches do you think could work with a low level group of kids and make them better or make them contenders? All of the coaches on this list are amazing in one facet or the other. But in terms of complete development, one of these coaches stands out (in my mind) more than the rest. Which of these coaches could/would change the culture of a non-contender and develop from the ground up.
Top Programs
Sue P-Mitty
Tom G-SMS
Kelly S-Miramonte
Steve P-Salesian
Malik M-BOD
Doc S Pinewood
Other Coaches/program
Rob O-Heritage
Matt L-Pitt
Elgin L-Carondolet
Pico W-Brookside
Doug N-Mission SJ
Cherrie C-Logan
Wade N-Presentation
Jason Lee-Lincoln (SF)
Chris R-Lincoln (Stk)
Jeff O-McClatchy
Allison J-Vanden
LaRyan R-SHC
I could go on and on..but I think it's a list to start the conversation.
As always, I'm going to add Erin Llewellyn of Emery. Larry Minnich of Bay (who won a state title at Convent of the Sacred Heart) is excellent too.
Dani Oswood, who was at Athenian, has moved away so she no longer is on the list.