ADVERTISEMENT

Bells vs Folsom

I posted this on another thread but thought my initial breakdown on the two teams and the game would be relevant here.

First, let me say that I love the Bells and how they play. In the two games that I saw that were extremely efficient using the run and could pass when they needed to. I thought their speed helped a lot, but the speed did not seem over and above what I have seen in the SFL from about 4 teams. With that said, I really liked their QB, Martig, and how he ran that offense. They will score some points on Folsom, that is for sure.

Folsom has the best offensive line around, anchored by Jonah Williams (Full ride to Alabama) and Kooper Richardson. I think the fact that a CA kid from Folsom was recruited by old Sabey Sabes says it all about this guy. He is a monster and moves mountains. Folsom's RB's are solid and can be dynamic at times with Tre Green and Roger Neal. The real catalyst on offense is Jake Jeffrey who is a dual threat QB that can kill you with his legs and throw the ball 60 yards in the air. If the Bells cannot contain Jake Jeffrey, it will be a long night. The offense is not the "high powered 60 point a night offense" that it was last year. They rely on running the ball, controlling the clock, and setting up the big play. They can also score in bunches when they have to. I think what most people don't realize about Folsom is how their physical play wears teams down in the 4th quarter. It has happened all year. The Dogs have been in many dog fights until the 4th quarter when their offense and defensive lines finally take over the opposing team.

Folsom plays in arguably the best league in Northern California, where nearly every game is a flat out war. Most teams are not ready for that kind of grind...Especially the physical part. Folsom is battle tested and extremely resilient. You have to remember that this team has not lost a game in over 2 years. The Bells will have their hands full with the Dogs on Friday night.

Now, from what I saw with the Bells during the two games I saw, they should have success running the ball on Folsom. The problem will be if they cannot run the ball and are forced to pass. If this happens, it could get ugly. If the Bells can run the ball effectively, this game will be an absolute barn burner. If Martig gets going and can wear down that Folsom defensive line, they could be in a good position, come the 4th quarter. I also believe weather will play a factor in this game. If it is really nasty, I think that will favor the Bells and their ball control offense. I think if the weather is decent, it will favor Folsom with their all around offensive attack. The good news is the game is on turf and not on sloppy wet grass. I think this benefits both teams.

God Bless.

Pete
 
  • Like
Reactions: CaliTrojan4Life
Got this game scheduled on my DVR. Looking forward to Friday night! Bells in an upset!
 
Here are a couple takes on this games:

This is one of the fastest teams Bellarmine has fielded. I think they are faster than Elk Grove or St. Mary's, which could pose some problems for Folsom.

Having played a run based team like Elk Grove last week, does that give Folsom an advantage seeing a similar style recently? Or is Folsom getting beat up after playing two good running attacks the last two weeks?

Bellarmine doesn't see many good passing attacks and Folsom's is excellent. How they defend the pass will be the difference.

I think this is a back and forth game with Folsom getting a 7-10 point win.
 
The good thing about this game is most of the knowledgeable fans are expecting a good competitive game. Folsom an unbeaten 14-0 team ranked in the top 10 in CA and is one of only 4 unbeaten teams in the top 10. Bell's at 12-1 ranked 19th with their only loss to Mitty in which Bell's QB Troy Martig did not play. Everyone knows that Folsom is the favorite going in and the computers say by 31-22 [Folsom +9]. I would agree with Hatchball's assessment that a "shoot-out" favors Folsom & if Folsom gets out front early it will not bode well for the Bell's. As others have also pointed out the Bell's best strategy is to slow the game down in a lower scoring grind it out game, much like against Riordan - Riordan averaged 35-points per game for the season and Bell's held to 6-points in a 14-6 win. Folsom averages a whopping 43-points per game over the season while the Bell's are at 32 while Folsom had the stronger schedule.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RodneyPete45
Bellarmine will not win a shootout with Folsom, they need to keep Folsom's offense off the field. They need their double wing to chew up yards and move the chains and limit Folsom to 2 possessions per quarter at most. If they can stop Folsom from scoring on 1/2 of their drives where Folsom can be limited to about 28 points, that's their chance. This Bellarmine offense should be able to score 2 TDs per half against Folsom, then they just need to sneak a FG in there somewhere.
Sounds good. Folsom by three scores.
 
Last edited:
Here are a couple takes on this games:

This is one of the fastest teams Bellarmine has fielded. I think they are faster than Elk Grove or St. Mary's, which could pose some problems for Folsom.

Having played a run based team like Elk Grove last week, does that give Folsom an advantage seeing a similar style recently? Or is Folsom getting beat up after playing two good running attacks the last two weeks?

Bellarmine doesn't see many good passing attacks and Folsom's is excellent. How they defend the pass will be the difference.

I think this is a back and forth game with Folsom getting a 7-10 point win.

Good analysis! No doubt BCP is taking all their practice time to defend against the pass. But unfortunately I doubt they can even come close to replicating Folsom's offense. And probably Folsom is taking all their practice time defending against the d-wing-t and closing the gaps from the inside run. The d-wing-t is much easier to duplicate aside from the ball deception that BCP is pretty good at.
 
Bells have a 4/5 star kicker who has made many kicks under pressure. Could this be the difference if Bells can control the ball??
 
One concern about Bellarmine is their pass rush, how much pressure they can put on Jeffery through four quarters. If Bellarmine can't keep Folsom's offense off the field that undersized Bellarmine D-line will be on fumes in the second half, and Jeffery will have plenty of time to find an open receiver.
 
I would be more worried about Jefferys ability to run than finding an open WR. Last time Bellarmine faced a very good spread attack was against Santa Margarita a few years back. They played a lot of man coverage and if they do that Jeffery could easily take off on a lot of pass plays.
 
I would be more worried about Jefferys ability to run than finding an open WR. Last time Bellarmine faced a very good spread attack was against Santa Margarita a few years back. They played a lot of man coverage and if they do that Jeffery could easily take off on a lot of pass plays.
You are right on. This dude is lightening fast and can throw the ball 60 yards in the air. A true dual threat who can legitimately throw the ball.

I am sure the Bells will end up spying him somehow. They have to. Straight man could be dangerous.

God bless.
 
You are right on. This dude is lightening fast and can throw the ball 60 yards in the air. A true dual threat who can legitimately throw the ball.

I am sure the Bells will end up spying him somehow. They have to. Straight man could be dangerous.

God bless.

That SM team had a decent dual threat QB as well. They limited him to 77 yards on 20 carries. I cant recall how they did it but they did lol
 
That SM team had a decent dual threat QB as well. They limited him to 77 yards on 20 carries. I cant recall how they did it but they did lol
Yep - and BCP lost that game in the last minute! Still BCP did way better than I expected against SM, to the place in the 4th quarter where I was pretty sure the Bells were going to win that game.
 
That SM team had a decent dual threat QB as well. They limited him to 77 yards on 20 carries. I cant recall how they did it but they did lol

That Bells front 7 was outstanding that year. The SM QB (Stanton) was a better runner than passer but the Bell's played too much man coverage without enough good coverage players and got burned.

That being said, Bellermine could very well have won the game. The INT deep in Bell's territory was a killer.
As usual, with closely matched teams, TO's are often the difference.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT