80-54 was the final. Even a power outage couldn't stop the Irish. SI just had no answer.
80-54 was the final. Even a power outage couldn't stop the Irish. SI just had no answer.
Is that some back for shc or SI? And I know it's been years, but when did SI go co-ed? Did they build out or was boys enrollment down?Finally got just about everyone back! Once they get settled into roles things will get very interesting
Is that some back for shc or SI? And I know it's been years, but when did SI go co-ed? Did they build out or was boys enrollment down?
Lets see the boys' do this, but it hasn't happen as long as I have been a supporter. Even when SHC boys clearly had better teams they manage to foul up the Bruce Mahoney games or barely squeak by and make SI look good. But thank god for the girls at SHC.
SHC had 3-4 girls with various injuries..they were playing with only 6-7 girls and still managed to come out above .500. They should be firing on all cylinders soon and tuned up. Where is #33 from? She looks like she can play but young, and where is Saponi this year for SHC? They need the tall girls to support Thomas to play better defense...SI went Co-ed in early 90s? With a lot of the girl schools closing in SF, it forced the bigger schools to consolidate.
Mitty beat Valley Christian tonite by 44 points. I don't think transfers will make a difference this season. Mitty beat SHC last year in both games by 25+ point margin each game. They are a match up nightmare for any WCAL team. I wonder if they try and have IT guard Haley Jones? This will be entertaining, but I believe Mitty will be too much in the long run.
Top to bottom the best talent? That's really funny.. I almost spit my coffee all over my work desk.. I really hope Mitty wins by 30 on Friday so we can all hear your excuse that the team hasnt had time to gel
And sure maybe beating Valley that bad isnt a stretch, but its not like Valley hasnt been a CCS open team the last few years. They will have a good chance to finish 3rd in the league and again make the open, so I wouldn't exactly suggest they are irrelevant.
I was just trying to defend the hate you spoke first, thats all. You are absolutely right, they have done nothing impressive in the open. My point was just that its not like they are a terrible team, I wasnt calling them great.Beating Valley by 44 isn't saying much. When have they ever been relevant?
I was just trying to defend the hate you spoke first, thats all. You are absolutely right, they have done nothing impressive in the open. My point was just that its not like they are a terrible team, I wasnt calling them great.
The main point of my point of my post was about your talent comment. Do you actually believe that top to bottom shc has the best talent around like you stated??
Mitty 7 deep??? The game they beat Clovis West they easily rotated 9 and really all ten were in the game. Sue was rotating 5 at a time in bishop o'dowd game.
Four seniors D1 commits
One sophmore 10 D1 offers
Two Juniors with 8 D1 offers
They beat defending Georgia state champion at TOC, a team that has Stanford committed forward Maya Dodson and Tennessee commit Kasiyahna Kushkituah.
Their record is 10-2 and stands as one of the toughest schedules in the country.
Mitty very unselfish with the ball avg 16.5 assists a game vs SHC 6.0.
Mitty looking do something no team in WCAL has done, which is go back to back undefeated WCAL seasons.
SHC will have their hands full for sure
The 7 was referring to D1 players either offered and signed. The rotation is 9-10.
How many coaches rotate five players at a time in a championship game of an extremely high caliber national tournament?
It will be fun Friday nite. SHC is a good team with a great player. They will go 8-2 in WCAL. The two losses will be to Mitty.
Mitty looking do something no team in WCAL has done, which is go back to back undefeated WCAL seasons.
This was the only thing that SJ said that wasnt true.. it has been done by both mitty and shc.
But in regards to this year, everything he said was spot on.. AM will play 10 but their rotation is a solid 9. And sure SHC could rotate 5 at a time (any team with 10+ players technically can), but in my opinion 7-8-9 for SHC is not as strong as 7-8-9 for AM, they lose very little going to the bench. In fact, in the games I have seen this year, I'm not sure I have seen the same starting line up twice. 7-9 in one game could easily all start in the next, and that is what makes their depth impressive, not just the fact that everyone plays.
This amount of fresh bodies with no drop in talent or skill creates problems.
SH became SHC in 1987; SI went co-ed following year.Is that some back for shc or SI? And I know it's been years, but when did SI go co-ed? Did they build out or was boys enrollment down?
Judging from tonight's game, maybe not.Top to bottom they have the best talent around
Judging from tonight's game, maybe not.
Lets see the boys' do this, but it hasn't happen as long as I have been a supporter. Even when SHC boys clearly had better teams they manage to foul up the Bruce Mahoney games or barely squeak by and make SI look good. But thank God for the girls at SHC.
I tried to tell him.. I was almost right when I hoped for 30.. Talent level on the floor from top to bottom was not even close... IT was great, but Mitty couldn't seem to play the scouting report.. Force her LEFT...
Oh and he mentioned something about the jv team.. They lost by about 30 also...
I'm not trying to hate on a good team in shc.. Because they are good, but call it like it is and not how you see it through those rose (or maybe green) colored glasses
Judging from tonight's game, maybe not.