Who makes up NCS selection committee? Clearly no one from this msg board!! Here are some unexplainable seeding issues and pairings.
D1- hard to mess up cuz lot of teams play each other and its all about who gets to play DLS for championship
D2-I think #10 for American, MVAL champion at 8-2 is low. Granted MVAL not great but they are a league champ with win over Moreau and a quality loss to D1 #11 Dublin. #6Maria Carillo(6-4) #7 Casa Grande (4-6) #8 Pinole(6-4) and #9 Windsor (6-4) all NOT league champs could easily been under American. I think Granada (4-6) getting a #4 is high, certainly over #5 Tennyson (8-2) with only losses to D1 San Leandro in OT and Logan. Granada has a lot of "quality" losses, whatever that worth.
D3 - Campo Analy and Rancho obviously 1-2-3. Odowd at #4 is a joke. At 5-5 with NO quality wins they do not deserve a 4 over #5 Alhambra(6-4) and #6 Petaluma(7-3). Petaluma with a last second lost to Analy should have recd the #4. #7 El Cerritto (5-5) no different than O'dowd with win over Oakland Tech and St Marys loss. You could argue EC wins over Salesian Pinole and Hercules all playoff teams-- are better wins than Castro Valley and Berkeley--both out and an OT win over D4 #12 Encinal for Odowd.
D4- Hard to argue top 4, maybe could say Moreau could go #3 over Fortuna(10-0) . #8 Fort Bragg also went 10-0 so why so much more love to Fortuna. What doesnt make sense is pitting FB against St Helena round 1 as well as #7 Justin Siena vs league foe #10 San Marin. If avoidable league opponents should not play in 1st round. would have been easy to switch SanMarin and St Helena. St Marys-Piedmont-Justin had to go in that order, Piedmont beat Justin, common opponent for Piedmont and StMarys was Moreau, Moreua handled StMarys, but blewout Piedmont. Easily could have gone 4-5-6 with Fortuna at 7 or 6-7-8 with Fort bragg at 5.
D5- Looks good, easier with less teams, seedings much more clear .
That my 2 cents!!
D1- hard to mess up cuz lot of teams play each other and its all about who gets to play DLS for championship
D2-I think #10 for American, MVAL champion at 8-2 is low. Granted MVAL not great but they are a league champ with win over Moreau and a quality loss to D1 #11 Dublin. #6Maria Carillo(6-4) #7 Casa Grande (4-6) #8 Pinole(6-4) and #9 Windsor (6-4) all NOT league champs could easily been under American. I think Granada (4-6) getting a #4 is high, certainly over #5 Tennyson (8-2) with only losses to D1 San Leandro in OT and Logan. Granada has a lot of "quality" losses, whatever that worth.
D3 - Campo Analy and Rancho obviously 1-2-3. Odowd at #4 is a joke. At 5-5 with NO quality wins they do not deserve a 4 over #5 Alhambra(6-4) and #6 Petaluma(7-3). Petaluma with a last second lost to Analy should have recd the #4. #7 El Cerritto (5-5) no different than O'dowd with win over Oakland Tech and St Marys loss. You could argue EC wins over Salesian Pinole and Hercules all playoff teams-- are better wins than Castro Valley and Berkeley--both out and an OT win over D4 #12 Encinal for Odowd.
D4- Hard to argue top 4, maybe could say Moreau could go #3 over Fortuna(10-0) . #8 Fort Bragg also went 10-0 so why so much more love to Fortuna. What doesnt make sense is pitting FB against St Helena round 1 as well as #7 Justin Siena vs league foe #10 San Marin. If avoidable league opponents should not play in 1st round. would have been easy to switch SanMarin and St Helena. St Marys-Piedmont-Justin had to go in that order, Piedmont beat Justin, common opponent for Piedmont and StMarys was Moreau, Moreua handled StMarys, but blewout Piedmont. Easily could have gone 4-5-6 with Fortuna at 7 or 6-7-8 with Fort bragg at 5.
D5- Looks good, easier with less teams, seedings much more clear .
That my 2 cents!!