Lee has a top 11 of Michigan, South Carolina, Baylor, Louisville, Duke, North Carolina, Texas, Flordia State, Stanford, Arizona and USC.
Only three of 11 are from the Pac-12.
Only three of 11 are from the Pac-12.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
She’s tough. Watched her a couple times last year down stretch. Honestly don’t think she will have a hard time playing wherever she ends up.Lee has a top 11 of Michigan, South Carolina, Baylor, Louisville, Duke, North Carolina, Texas, Flordia State, Stanford, Arizona and USC.
Only three of 11 are from the Pac-12.
Morgan CheliLee vs Kennedy Smith who you got?
Not always the case when you got dogs in line before you and it's a top tier program.if she can play, she will be able to play right away wherever
I feel like Jordan Lee has the most upside although all the two other players can play. I think with some good college coaching Jordan will get even better which will be scary.ESPN
Says Lee 9, KSmith 13 and Cheli 15
Some people think the opposite order
then she aint a dog.Not always the case when you got dogs in line before you and it's a top tier program.
I feel like Jordan Lee has the most upside although all the two other players can play. I think with some good college coaching Jordan will get even better which will be scary.
I think some would argue that she is a point guardCheli has the highest ceiling because she's a 6-1 or 6-2 wing.
you used a lot of words to say very little. WHY do you think that she has more potential than the other 2? What makes you say that? And I'm not saying you're wrong, just curious to your personal reasons.I don't believe there is any question that these 3 girls are the real deal. I just think Lee has the most upside. Players will evolve in college. Some will get better in college and some will exist as the competitive landscape begins to even out. It's yet to be seen how these three young ladies evolve in college because they ar still in high school. But I believe Lee has the most potential to go further and will play guard in college. I do believe they will all be succeed though.
you used a lot of words to say very little. WHY do you think that she has more potential than the other 2? What makes you say that? And I'm not saying you're wrong, just curious to your personal reasons.
Again, alot of words when this was the answer I was looking for. No dog in the fight, just genuinely curious as to what helped you form that opinion that you are obviously entitled to have. If not for that, then why the hell are we all here? To get perspective from others that get to see other kids more, or see them in a different setting. I have seen Jordan Lee play very few times, Cheli maybe a dozen times, and Smith only on tv in the state game. So yea, I was hoping for a little more insight than "players evolve in college and some get better and some don't". Thanks for your more insightful response though!I just don't believe Lee's potential has been truly tapped based on what I've seen with the SMS system of play and she is a exceptional overall athlete.
I only said that because she plays PG at Mitty and PG for the Cal Stars. Each are one of the top teams in their arena, so why wouldn't you call her a PG?Cheli is a solid player that’s very skilled but definitely is not a PG.
She will not be a PG at the next level. She’s a 2 guard that can bring the ball up. Big difference. And who else would Mitty have run point last year that would be comfortable with the ball ? She was the best candidate.Again, alot of words when this was the answer I was looking for. No dog in the fight, just genuinely curious as to what helped you form that opinion that you are obviously entitled to have. If not for that, then why the hell are we all here? To get perspective from others that get to see other kids more, or see them in a different setting. I have seen Jordan Lee play very few times, Cheli maybe a dozen times, and Smith only on tv in the state game. So yea, I was hoping for a little more insight than "players evolve in college and some get better and some don't". Thanks for your more insightful response though!
I only said that because she plays PG at Mitty and PG for the Cal Stars. Each are one of the top teams in their arena, so why wouldn't you call her a PG?
Is your concern her playing offense as a college PG or defense? Or both?She will not be a PG at the next level. She’s a 2 guard that can bring the ball up. Big difference. And who else would Mitty have run point last year that would be comfortable with the ball ? She was the best candidate.
College - a different story.
No different than Haley Jones at Stanford. She ran the point 50% of the time, especially against big defenders. Neither Morgan or Haley are the classic "pass first' PG, but easily handle the position. Will Morgn fill that role at UConn? Depends if they have a better fit at the position, but she can certainly play PG in college.She will not be a PG at the next level. She’s a 2 guard that can bring the ball up. Big difference. And who else would Mitty have run point last year that would be comfortable with the ball ? She was the best candidate.
College - a different story.