There's a very good reason why this isn't a crime. I'll elaborate below.
Why? Be specific. Explain how the Texas system could possibly happen here, much less be good for California.
This doesn't work because the divisions do not line up, plus the sections don't all have the same number of divisions.
Plus, you simply could not have only 5 divisions in California. People really need to get over that.
You need to remember that, regardless of in which Midwest state you were raised, California is going to have at least two-three times more teams. You simply could not break it down like this. Further, 2000 students might be a decent-sized school in NorCal, it's only a medium-sized school in SoCal.
Further, if you put in a sliding scale, you automatically put NorCal at a disadvantage because all of the schools will be smaller than their SoCal counterparts.
Great... but in 4 years, we're going to end up with the same sort of setup we have now, since there are a number of very large schools (3000+ students) that just aren't all that good.
Ok, I think that people need to get over this, too. We, especially in NorCal, have this notion that "only the best teams" should be advancing. That's not really the point of having multiple divisions. What should be happening is that the best teams that represent their divisions advance.
People want runner-up teams to stop advancing? Fine, but the result is that B- and C- league teams advance. In case nobody has noticed, this is exactly what happens in all other sections. There's nothing unique about the CCS that should prevent this.