Thanks for the reply, Thunder. But my opinion and evaluation is far from lazy.
Nothing personal, as I enjoy your posts and general demeanor on the board. To clarify, when I say 'lazy' take, I just mean that line of reasoning has been proven flawed and fallible so many times. Just because a team experienced a blowout, doesn't mean they can't win the next matchup. It's happened many times before.
Just last season Mater Dei was blown out by St. John Bosco 41-18. Guess what happened 6 weeks later?
I could cite you many more examples of teams losing in blowout fashion only to flip the script the very next season. It happens all the time.
So with that in mind, it's lazy and beyond flawed to use that reason as the crux of why you're asserting that nothing would change.
It can't be emphasized enough how much different a team 2014 was from 2012 and 2013. Light years apart.
You make a solid agreement for '14 Folsom. But we'll just have to respectfully disagree.
So you really believe that the 2018 team that was one play from losing to far from great Cathedral Catholic team -- who lost by 12 to 6-4 La Costa Canyon no less -- and needed OT to pull out the W was somehow better than a team that put running clocks on all their opponents? Even an Oceanside team that was at least as good as this 2018 Cathedral team?
Let's also not forget that 2018 Folsom surrendered 46 to Central-Fresno. A good, but far from great team.
The 2010 Folsom team, while suffering a blowout loss to National top 10 Grant Union, still blew out 2 teams that were better than Cathedral Catholic. The far less than 100% healthy Pacers later that season and Serra-Gardena were both stronger opponents.
If you believe 2010 or 2014 would have struggled with Cathedral, I don't know what else to say.
DLS gets flack about "hyper-improvement", but '14 Folsom apparently takes the cake.
You're comparing apples and oranges.
I happen to subscribe to DLS's 'in-season' hyper improvement. IMO, on average, they improve over the course of a season more than 99% of teams.
That said, the naysayers are talking about over the course of the 'same' season. Not from one season to the next. That's an entirely different thing and topic of discussion. A ton more variables change from one season to the next versus during the same season. Rosters are different and player development happens.
Despite breaking in a green QB early on, wasn't 2018 DLS a much better team than 2017?? Wasn't 2006 much better than 2005?? Hell, 2005 was much better than 2004, which is widely considered their weakest team.
I really don't understand how you can argue against.