Folsom state best 36 game winning streak

[ThunderRam]

Back to the thread topic, I'm trying to figure out Joe Davidson's math for stating that it's a 36-game streak, rather than 35. I think he relies upon Maxpreps into too much (they have the incorrect info too). Also, he's wrong with this comment as well:

Folsom opens SFL play against No. 9 Granite Bay next week. The Bulldogs are also unbeaten at 3-0 with a bye week mixed in.

Folsom is 4-0 so far this season and haven't had a BYE week yet. I think he might be referring to the GRIZZLIES, who did have a BYE week already.

Regarding the current streak, somebody help me out here, but I'm coming up with a 35-game regular season streak, not 36.

Their last loss was to Pleasant Grove on 10/28/2011 in Week 9 and they won their next game (the final regular season game). So ....

2011: 1-0
2012: 10-0
2013: 10-0
2014: 10-0
2015: 4-0


Unless my math skills are waning and the calculator on my computer inaccurate, that's 35-games.

Quite honestly, I have found that Joe D is often wrong with the stats he posts, although I do have to give him credit for finally getting DLS's NorCal unbeaten streak correct at 261 and counting (unless you count Clovis West in NorCal due to geography and their recent inclusion into the NorCal bracket).

 

[renegades10]

Actually, they were exposed big time against Trinity. It was on National TV. No where to hide that...Tough to hide a QB that cannot throw a 5 yard pass.

Browning is looking great. He actually looked great in the second half against Boise State. He is a true freshman, remember? The FIRST EVER to start at UW as a true freshman. No matter what team he picks apart, they are still D1 teams.

Yes, Folsom would have beat DLS last year. And it bothers many of you...

Exposed is getting your doors blown in, like what DLS has done to Folsom the two times they played. Losing an OOS game on the road by one score against another top nationally ranked team is not getting exposed.

It's great that Browning is the first true freshman to start in the history of UW, it's also not surprising given that all the previous QB's recruited there were from a previous coach. Cyler Miles, Troy Williams, Lindquist, Carta-Samuels. Browning is a much better fit for Peterson's offense, essentially he's found his Kellen Moore.

And Sac St. is an FCS program who got blown out by Weber St...Like I said, his next six games will be far more telling than the last two creampuffs he faced. He will more than likely be a great college QB, but his status as a freshman is far more telling about the QB's recruited under a previous coach, no different than Jared Goff at Cal. Timing and circumstance. Put another way, look around the Pac-12 and tell me what other programs he would be starting for, likely the bottom feeders.

 

[ThunderRam]

Just another tidbit, but I believe Folsom's 35-game regular season streak is the longest in the SJS since Central Catholic reeled off 47 straight (61 overall) from 2001 through 2005.

• Grant Union won 32 in a row from 2007 through 2011 and is riding a 16-game streak heading into this weekend.
• Merced won 32 in a row from 1987 through 1990.
  
• Jesuit won 30 in a row from 1997 through 2000.
• Cordova won 30 in a row from 1978 through 1981.
• Cordova won 30 in a row from 1981 through 1984.
  
• Cordova had a 26 game unbeaten streak (2-ties) from 1984 through 1987.
  
• Grant Union had a 26 game unbeaten streak (1-tie) from 1996 through 1999.
• Escalon won 26 in a row from 2007 through 2009.
• Atwater won 25 in a row from 1995 through 1998.

 

[ThunderRam]

I brought this up on the National board and will mention it here as well. Think of Folsom's current run when considering DLS's winning streaks (151 overall and 261 against NorCal). Had the NorCal Regional and State Bowl games not existed in 2012 and 2013, the Bulldogs would be riding a 46-game winning streak right now with the opportunity to extend to as many as 56 should they run the table again this season. That's the setup DLS had in front of them up until 2006 and 2012 when the State and Regional games were added respectively. Not having to play those games certainly creates an opportunity for a much longer streak.

Since the State Bowl games were introduced thus a guaranteed game against a top 3 team in CA at year's end, the Spartans longest win streak is 40. It makes a huge difference playing those Regional/State games.

The guys in Texas, Florida, Georgia and New Jersey have a skewed opinion of both NorCal and SoCal football because of those streaks but don't understand that a playoff system beyond sectionals didn't exist. Funny, though, because Allen currently has a 47-game streak in Tx despite the tough playoff bracket.

 

[G61]

I brought this up on the National board and will mention it here as well. Think of Folsom's current run when considering DLS's winning streaks (151 overall and 261 against NorCal). Had the NorCal Regional and State Bowl games not existed in 2012 and 2013, the Bulldogs would be riding a 46-game winning streak right now with the opportunity to extend to as many as 56 should they run the table again this season. That's the setup DLS had in front of them up until 2006 and 2012 when the State and Regional games were added respectively. Not having to play those games certainly creates an opportunity for a much longer streak.

Since the State Bowl games were introduced thus a guaranteed game against a top 3 team in CA at year's end, the Spartans longest win streak is 40. It makes a huge difference playing those Regional/State games.

The guys in Texas, Florida, Georgia and New Jersey have a skewed opinion of both NorCal and SoCal football because of those streaks but don't understand that a playoff system beyond sectionals didn't exist. Funny, though, because Allen currently has a 47-game streak in Tx despite the tough playoff bracket.

Thanks ThunderRam,
I wanted to bring that up myself but I figured everyone else would just jump on here and get angry since it had to do with Folsom.

What they have done and the streak they have going is truly one of the best stories in CA right now. They are a public school that has built a great program, besides DLS.

Despite my homerism for Folsom, I really enjoy the fact they play in the SFL. I truly enjoy and respect watching all of those teams play.

 

[BigMann08]

It was already the #2 or #3 league in NorCal before those additions. Really only the WCAL was clearly better. Some will still argue for the WCAL, but it's a much tougher sell now. Regardless, it's not drastically different.

Adding a two time state champion and the winner of the last 3 SJS Champions to your league is a huge difference! Lets not forget that Oak Ridge was added to the fold as well.

You're drastically underestimating that Rocklin team, which had quite a few D1 FBS players themselves, especially at the most important position on the field (Laughrea, Cummings, Huff, Moore). That same Rocklin team minus their star QB came within 1 play of beating the PAC-5 champ and Servite's best team in years. They were one of the better teams the SJS has produced the past 10 years.

Im not taking anything away from Rocklin. They had a great team. But Grant had (Booker, Thompson, Sample, Big V, Lopa, Fields, Epps, Lang, Cameron, Paulo, etc.). My argument is that they played 1 dimensional football offensively. When a good team stacks the box on a one dimensional team it makes life miserable. The Pacers were one dimensional that season. Booker left, Booker right, Booker middle. That season, Grant had a 6'5 Tight end, and Five speedy receivers who weren't even utilized in their offense. They also had Shaq Thompson, who was easily their best qb option. Grant did not utilize the speed that they had. They had six guys who could take it to the house at any moment but only utilized one person offensively. This is the reason that they struggled against (Bellevue, Oak Ridge, and Rocklin). These teams only had to key in on Booker. Despite that they still were a yard/field goal away from winning the game. Again my point is that they handicapped themselves offensively all season. And to think, Aaron Garcia was on the sideline! I guarantee you had he been given complete control of the offense; Grant wins 3 state championships in a row!

NU struggles because Dave Humphers retired and they aren't at all the same program they once were

You are correct. NU has had a wealth of success in the SJS. I'm not taking anything away from that. But the landscape of SJS football has changed. The coaching in the area has gotten better. The Sacramento Region has grown immensely. As you eluded, Humphers had a great run. The wing T worked for NU and continues to work for several other local programs.

What you are suggesting just isn't at all true. If it was, then how have the Pacers managed to win 6 section titles and a State title since 1999? How did they manage benchmark out-of-state wins against State Champs Bellevue and Alta? Obviously they don't run into the problem you're seeing year after year. Proof is in the pudding, my friend. Also, De La Salle's offensive scheme is fairly predicable, don't ya think? How do they do with it?

My point in all of this is that there is nothing wrong with diversifying your playbook/scheme. The teams that beat Bellevue and Alta were good. They also caught Bellevue after they had just lost to Katy (Texas). De la Salle doesn't need to change their offense. They haven't lost to a Nor Cal Team in over 20 years. De la Salle is the king of NorCal. If Folsom runs through league again; it may be time for GB and Del Oro to abandon that smashmouth tough guy brand of football. Especially since most high school secondary's and pass rushes are not of the caliber that you mentioned (Grant 2010, PG 2011, De la Salle).

 

[WWHS44]

You're drastically underestimating that Rocklin team, which had quite a few D1 FBS players themselves, especially at the most important position on the field (Laughrea, Cummings, Huff, Moore). That same Rocklin team minus their star QB came within 1 play of beating the PAC-5 champ and Servite's best team in years. They were one of the better teams the SJS has produced the past 10 years.

In fact, I've said it many times that the 2009 season in D2 was the deepest and best I recall seeing. IMO, Rocklin, Grant Union, Del Oro, St. Mary's, and Folsom ALL could have went to State and won that year -- and they were all in the same playoff bracket. Folsom won State the very next season with essentially the same team and lost big to essentially the same Pacers team when it was completely healthy. Del Oro upset one of St. Mary's best teams ever.

Sure, I have no problem admitting that Grant should have beaten Rocklin in that game. When you have to reply upon 4 stops inside the 2 yard line and a missed 21-yd FG to win, you got lucky. But Rocklin was in the position they were against a great team because they had a special team themselves. Rocklin and possibly St. Mary's were the only teams that could have posed problems for the Pacers defense that season, as they could run or throw the ball with equal effectiveness. Rocklin had a 2K rusher with over 40 TD's and an elite QB/WR combo. Not many teams have that. Despite that, the Pacers were 1 yard or a chip shot FG away from winning. They make that play and they beat Del Oro and Servite the next 2 games.




NU struggles because Dave Humphers retired and they aren't at all the same program they once were. Saying that their wing-t isn't going to work in D1/D2 has been proven wrong for over 25 years. They've been a D1 team the entire time and from 1989 through 2009 they went 202-51-2 with 7 section title appearances and 4 wins. The most recent was in 2009 when they nearly earned a State Bowl bid. They had a decent year in 2011, but have fallen on hard times since. It had zero to do with their offensive system. Bellevue-Washington has been running a version of the wing-t forever and has always been a Nationally relevant program with numerous benchmark wins over elite competition, namely De La Salle.

I respect your opinion, but what you're saying just doesn't hold true.

You're drastically underestimating that Rocklin team, which had quite a few D1 FBS players themselves, especially at the most important position on the field (Laughrea, Cummings, Huff, Moore). That same Rocklin team minus their star QB came within 1 play of beating the PAC-5 champ and Servite's best team in years. They were one of the better teams the SJS has produced the past 10 years.

In fact, I've said it many times that the 2009 season in D2 was the deepest and best I recall seeing. IMO, Rocklin, Grant Union, Del Oro, St. Mary's, and Folsom ALL could have went to State and won that year -- and they were all in the same playoff bracket. Folsom won State the very next season with essentially the same team and lost big to essentially the same Pacers team when it was completely healthy. Del Oro upset one of St. Mary's best teams ever.

Sure, I have no problem admitting that Grant should have beaten Rocklin in that game. When you have to reply upon 4 stops inside the 2 yard line and a missed 21-yd FG to win, you got lucky. But Rocklin was in the position they were against a great team because they had a special team themselves. Rocklin and possibly St. Mary's were the only teams that could have posed problems for the Pacers defense that season, as they could run or throw the ball with equal effectiveness. Rocklin had a 2K rusher with over 40 TD's and an elite QB/WR combo. Not many teams have that. Despite that, the Pacers were 1 yard or a chip shot FG away from winning. They make that play and they beat Del Oro and Servite the next 2 games.




NU struggles because Dave Humphers retired and they aren't at all the same program they once were. Saying that their wing-t isn't going to work in D1/D2 has been proven wrong for over 25 years. They've been a D1 team the entire time and from 1989 through 2009 they went 202-51-2 with 7 section title appearances and 4 wins. The most recent was in 2009 when they nearly earned a State Bowl bid. They had a decent year in 2011, but have fallen on hard times since. It had zero to do with their offensive system. Bellevue-Washington has been running a version of the wing-t forever and has always been a Nationally relevant program with numerous benchmark wins over elite competition, namely De La Salle.

I respect your opinion, but what you're saying just doesn't hold true.

 

[WWHS44]

Laughrea, Cummings, Huff, Moore

I am familar with the first three scholarship players. Where did the fourth scholarship to?

 

[remc]

One year of dominance?

Did we forget the state title in 2010...?

Agreed but want that in the D2 or D3 game. That team was fun to watchbAnd that Dan Graves kid was an amazing his quarterback. A great example of a kid who was a great high school player but lacked D1 size. Hope his playing somewhere.

 

[larry legend33]

Anybody going to GB vs Folsom? I think GB gives them a good game.
35 Folsom
24 Granite Bay

 

[ThunderRam]

If Folsom runs through league again; it may be time for GB and Del Oro to abandon that smashmouth tough guy brand of football. Especially since most high school secondary's and pass rushes are not of the caliber that you mentioned (Grant 2010, PG 2011, De la Salle).

You really rushing to judgment here. You act as if Folsom has been dominating the SFL and the area for decades. They've won the SFL all of one time. Maybe they make it two this season, maybe they don't. History will show you numerous cases of a program going on a 3, 4 or 5 year run. You don't suddenly change philosophies unless you had a terrible program to begin with. DO and GB are just fine.

 

[RunningRon]

Anybody going to GB vs Folsom? I think GB gives them a good game.
35 Folsom
24 Granite Bay

Planning to go, depends on whether or not the hall pass gets extended! GB is looking good this year, but nod goes to Folsom -- guessing 41-28.

 

[ThunderRam]

I am familar with the first three scholarship players. Where did the fourth scholarship to?

Never said they were scholarship players, just that they went to D1 FBS programs. I actually left Vince Gibbs off that list. Like Jackson Cummings at Stanford, Gibbs and Sean Moore were preferred walk-ons at Nevada. Cummings did get a scholarship from Stanford for at least one year, but I'm not certain if Gibbs or Moore ever did. I didn't follow either of their college careers, I just recall the announcement of where they were headed.

A quick search of the Interwebs returned this from the Rocklin HS football site. So 5 kids that went to FBS programs.

Chris Clowdus - Sierra College
Trevor Cooper - American River College
Sean Moore - University of Nevada Reno
Vince Gibbs - University of Nevada Reno
Jackson Cummings - Stanford
Holden Huff - Boise State
Nick Williams - Humboldt State
Nic Cooper - American River College
Jimmy Laughrea - Boise State
BJ Roberts - Butte College
Garth Keffer - UC Davis

 

[concrete17]

Agreed but want that in the D2 or D3 game. That team was fun to watchbAnd that Dan Graves kid was an amazing his quarterback. A great example of a kid who was a great high school player but lacked D1 size. Hope his playing somewhere.

Still a QB......
2 years @ Air Force and now at Cal Poly

 

[Dan12Kings]

Dont mean this in a disrespectful way, but why is Folsom's schedule so soft for being a nationally ranked powerhouse team? They did play a strong Clayton Valley team, but the rest of their non-league play was weak in comparison to many of the top programs. They clearly have a strong enough team to schedule elite programs and would like to see them play a much tougher schedule, perhaps more like what Del Oro has done.

Soft schedule, true. Vacaville is nowhere near Folsom and they have a way tougher nonleague schedule than Folsom, but I still think they will beat GB.

 

[G61]

Soft schedule, true. Vacaville is nowhere near Folsom and they have a way tougher nonleague schedule than Folsom, but I still think they will beat GB.

Vacaville has a tougher nonleague schedule than Folsom? What are you smoking?

Who did you play that was better than CVC? Folsom took them on for the first game of the season lol

Credibility thrashed...

 

[G61]

Anybody going to GB vs Folsom? I think GB gives them a good game.
35 Folsom
24 Granite Bay

I will be there!

 

[ThunderRam]

My argument is that they played 1 dimensional football offensively. When a good team stacks the box on a one dimensional team it makes life miserable. The Pacers were one dimensional that season. Booker left, Booker right, Booker middle.

That season, Grant had a 6'5 Tight end, and Five speedy receivers who weren't even utilized in their offense.

They also had Shaq Thompson, who was easily their best qb option. Grant did not utilize the speed that they had. They had six guys who could take it to the house at any moment but only utilized one person offensively.

This is the reason that they struggled against (Bellevue, Oak Ridge, and Rocklin). These teams only had to key in on Booker. Despite that they still were a yard/field goal away from winning the game. Again my point is that they handicapped themselves offensively all season. And to think, Aaron Garcia was on the sideline! I guarantee you had he been given complete control of the offense; Grant wins 3 state championships in a row! ).

I disagree with most everything you allege here. Your making a lot of assumptions. After all, you weren't out on the practice field with that team everyday as Coach Al was. You don't know what their limitations were. For example, what good is speed if you can't run good routes or catch the ball when it is thrown to you? What if you don't have a QB that can make the downfield throws down?

The reason the Pacers have had so many 2,000+ yard RB's is because their strength is usually in their o-line and their best player has most often been their RB. It's a pretty wise tactic to run an offensive system that plays to your strengths, don't ya think?

When Coach Al had Chad Elliott, he threw the ball -- a lot -- despite having Onterrio Smith in the backfield. Elliot threw for over 3,000 yds and 47 TD's which were huge numbers back in '96. When he didn't have a QB the very next season, he handed it to Onterrio much more often. When he had Tim Lang in 2006, he utilized his dual threat capabilities to the tune of 19 pass TD's and 18 rush TD's. Same goes for Koniseti in 2008. Last season Donovan Brown threw for over 2100 yards with 21 TD's to complement Collins and Green.

All of the above support the notion that Coach Al plays to the strengths of his best players. It's just that when you typically have athletic 300+ pound lineman and a stable of stud RB's, you are going to find yourself running it a lot more than you sling it. In the instances you brought up, he obviously didn't believe he had the tools to do what you suggested. If he did, he would have done it as he did with the likes of Paris Warren, Donte Stallworth, Mario Henderson, and Darvin McCauley.

Lastly, Shaq Thompson was not their best QB option in 2009. He was a still developing sophomore that was better on the defensive side of the ball, which is exactly where he played. Due to injury, he was moved back to QB his senior year and didn't exactly set the world on fire.

 

[paul_johnson884]

You would think Coach Al's long, successful record would speak for itself.

 

[larry legend33]

Keep me posted G61. I'm bummed because I can't make it. Nice article in the bee the other day about the other "JAKE.". I think he is going to open up some eyes tonite.

 

[G61]

Keep me posted G61. I'm bummed because I can't make it. Nice article in the bee the other day about the other "JAKE.". I think he is going to open up some eyes tonite.

I will for sure!

 

[BigMann08]

I disagree with most everything you allege here. Your making a lot of assumptions. After all, you weren't out on the practice field with that team everyday as Coach Al was. You don't know what their limitations were. For example, what good is speed if you can't run good routes or catch the ball when it is thrown to you? What if you don't have a QB that can make the downfield throws down?

The reason the Pacers have had so many 2,000+ yard RB's is because their strength is usually in their o-line and their best player has most often been their RB. It's a pretty wise tactic to run an offensive system that plays to your strengths, don't ya think?

When Coach Al had Chad Elliott, he threw the ball -- a lot -- despite having Onterrio Smith in the backfield. Elliot threw for over 3,000 yds and 47 TD's which were huge numbers back in '96. When he didn't have a QB the very next season, he handed it to Onterrio much more often. When he had Tim Lang in 2006, he utilized his dual threat capabilities to the tune of 19 pass TD's and 18 rush TD's. Same goes for Koniseti in 2008. Last season Donovan Brown threw for over 2100 yards with 21 TD's to complement Collins and Green.

All of the above support the notion that Coach Al plays to the strengths of his best players. It's just that when you typically have athletic 300+ pound lineman and a stable of stud RB's, you are going to find yourself running it a lot more than you sling it. In the instances you brought up, he obviously didn't believe he had the tools to do what you suggested. If he did, he would have done it as he did with the likes of Paris Warren, Donte Stallworth, Mario Henderson, and Darvin McCauley.

Lastly, Shaq Thompson was not their best QB option in 2009. He was a still developing sophomore that was better on the defensive side of the ball, which is exactly where he played. Due to injury, he was moved back to QB his senior year and didn't exactly set the world on fire.

No Assumptions... Dezzy Epps, Ference Lang, Ronald Thompson, Ronald Fields, Ronald Johnson could all catch the ball. Dezzy and Ference ran great routes. Route teaching is something that is perfected in practice. Dezzy and Ference were both good NCAA division 1 wr's. Ronald Fields had 8 interceptions his senior year and had a decent career at Texas A&M Commerce. These kids had no problem getting open. Especially against SJS defensive backs. You act as though the SJS has great defensive backs. lol That's funny.... These kids had track speed. They ran by everybody.

Shaq Thompson was indeed the best option at QB. The young man grew up playing QB and he led the JV team to an undefeated season his Freshman year. Shaq had incredible scrambling ability. Which would have placed a ton of pressure on opposing defenses. He certainly had the ability to scramble and make basic throws. Besides he would have been working with Aaron Garcia. Shaq was underutilized his Soph year. Especially on the offensive side. Ask anyone on the staff if they had to do it over again. Shaq would be their guy. Shaq's attributes were similar to Lang and Koneseti. He had the ability to make something out of nothing. Lang and Konesti bailed Grant out of so many 3rd and long 4th and 5 situations. They extended drives in ways that put too much pressure on opposing teams. Shaq was more than capable of doing that.

In 2009, Coach Al had more talent than he knew what to do with. lol The offense was indeed centered around Booker. Rightfully so. This should never cause you to become one dimensional offensively. Especially with the above receivers that I mentioned on the field/sideline. 2009 was not 96, 97, 98, 99 06 or 08. They had a completely different makeup. My point is- utilize all of your weapons.

I agree with you on Chad, Donovan, Konesseti and Lang. And the offensive line. No arguments. 2009 needed another offensive threat. Shaq Thompson #5 was that guy! I saw every game that year, except Bellevue. But I got the reports from several people in attendance. The Bellevue and Oak Ridge games let me know that the Pacers would have trouble against Rocklin. The biggest hole was at QB.

 

[RunningRon]

Great game last night - made it my game of the week to see. GB was slow to start, but made it interesting in 2nd quarter at 21-14. Maybe the final score tells a story - in 16 games last season, Folsom never scored less than 42 points, yet just 27 points in two games this season including last night -- the defense has given up 99 points this season thru 5 games vs 42 last season - same great coaches, same great schemes, different personnel. Are they down? No way, good looking team, but the gap is not as wide as 2014.

 

[justanotherdude333]

Great article in the bee today!

http://www.sacbee.com/sports/high-school/joe-davidson/article35801928.html

Go Bulldogs!

The thread should be titled:

"Folsom is undefeated in games they have not lost"

Joe D has always had a major inferiority complex about Sac, the Sac SJ region and particularly the football played there. His articles always have something implanted to try and make things look better. Every Folsom or Grant team that is undefeated for a few games is the greatest Sacramento (if not state) team in history. Sac guys led by JD cried and whined that DLS got a free ticket to the state championships and they needed a play in game. Oops. Be careful what you wish for. 2012 - 49-7 with seconds left when Folsom desperately tried to score one last time against DLS 3rd stringers and scored as time elapsed to cut the 42 point destruction to 34. Ditto 2013.

Oops. then in 2014 Sac guys led by JD cried and whined that there should be no play in game (otherwise Folsom would have got crushed by DLS again) and missed out on the SBG yet again.

As it was, Folsom showed its lack of class running up 68 points and throwing throwing throwing.

Folsom is undefeated in games it has not lost.

Poor JD and his inferiority complex.

 

[G61]

The thread should be titled:

"Folsom is undefeated in games they have not lost"

Joe D has always had a major inferiority complex about Sac, the Sac SJ region and particularly the football played there. His articles always have something implanted to try and make things look better. Every Folsom or Grant team that is undefeated for a few games is the greatest Sacramento (if not state) team in history. Sac guys led by JD cried and whined that DLS got a free ticket to the state championships and they needed a play in game. Oops. Be careful what you wish for. 2012 - 49-7 with seconds left when Folsom desperately tried to score one last time against DLS 3rd stringers and scored as time elapsed to cut the 42 point destruction to 34. Ditto 2013.

Oops. then in 2014 Sac guys led by JD cried and whined that there should be no play in game (otherwise Folsom would have got crushed by DLS again) and missed out on the SBG yet again.

As it was, Folsom showed its lack of class running up 68 points and throwing throwing throwing.

Folsom is undefeated in games it has not lost.

Poor JD and his inferiority complex.

Another person angry about Folsom again!? Figures...

Folsom showed class last year. They would have beaten teams by 80 if they tried. Browning hardly ever played into the 4th quarter. They were just that good, and that is what bothers you. They would have beaten DLS as well.

The streak is what it is. A regular season winning streak. It is quite impressive considering the league that they play in.

Take that jealousy over to watching film of the DLS and Trinity game. Better yet, go back on the thread created on here after that game. You will see some real class

 

[justanotherdude333]

Folsom called timeout with a few seconds left trailing by 42 point to try one last desperate throw into the end zone vs DLS third stringers

classless

"Folsom would beat DLS"

DLS has NEVER lost to a Sac area team

NEVER

including two WHIPPINGS of over matched Folsom

saying Folsom would win shows your bias and lack of understanding of actual facts

chomping on a loss to Trinity in 2015 is a red herring and meaningless

Folsom is undefeated in games it has not lost, you can slice it or dice it any way you want, they lost the last game of their 2013 season

maybe Joe D can come with an even better one - Folsom is undefeated in games against red uniforms on day games played on Friday

meanwhile the real world knows they have gotten their arse kicked in 2013 and 2012

 

[G61]

I might take your jealousy post seriously if you could spell Folsom right instead of "Solsom." LMFAO

Folsom Bulldogs... come out and watch

 

[justanotherdude333]

lol
lose the debate and harp on spelling and grammar

very typical

Folsom is undefeated on odd numbered days when they play against red uniforms and it is a Friday and a day game

has as much relevance

 

[G61]

Are you 10?

I know you didn't go to DLS, solely based on your spelling and grammar.

Troll lol

 

[justanotherdude333]

Are you 10?

I know you didn't go to DLS, solely based on your spelling and grammar.

Troll lol

can't win the debate so you attack the messenger

losers way of answering

Folsom is undefeated in games they have not lost is more relevant than the "regular season" mumbo jumbo and stands unchallenged

 

[justanotherdude333]

Are you 10? ATTACK #1

I know you didn't go to DLS, solely based on your spelling and grammar. ATTACK #2

Troll lol ATTACK #3

messages of substance = ZERO

 

[G61]

You are so rattled!

This is awesome. Typical troll.

By the way- the streak is now at 37. And going strong...

FYI- There is a spell check and grammar function on here. Please use it.

Troll

 

[justanotherdude333]

Oh BTW
DLS last loss in a regular season game to a team from Northern California was 1989
take that and eat it

 

[G61]

Too bad their last loss was August 29th, 2015.

Take that and eat it

 

[concrete17]

36 game winning streak is tasty. Longest running winning streak in CA!

Know it is now up to 37 wins.........uncovered the source of your inspiration and prodigious postings

 

[G61]

It's not "know" it's "now" LMFAO!

Must be that Bay Area "educamacation" lolllll

 

[concrete17]

It's now "know" it's "now" LMFAO!

Must be that Bay Area "educamacation" lolllll

No ....it looks more like a Folsom thing, primo

I was just posting in a "familiar" mode for your entertainment. Now watch this very carefully and slowly:
I left off the pronoun "I" at the beginning of the sentence because I mistakenly thought we were compadres of the posting zone; apologies, my error

Know (1st person singular, present verb tense) it is now (adverb, denoting present time) up to 37 wins....

I have included the pronoun where required for your peace of mind. Hope your proctalgia flare ups decrease.
Best wishes, concrete.

 

[G61]

Should have stayed in public school

 

[ThunderRam]

Know it is now up to 37 wins.........

No, he like a lot of people are simply repeating the incorrect total being reported by the media. It was 35 prior to the GB game not 36, and is now 36 not 37. Anybody that does any sort of elementary fact checking would figure this out, but apparently 99.9% of the population prefers to simply believe whatever they read.

 

[G61]

You are seriously that jealous to where you "fact check" to see if it is really 37 or if it is 36?

Wow...a new low. Seriously.