SF 54 Serra 52Any scores from tonite?
SF 54 Serra 52
Mitty 45 SI 42
Bells 57 SHC 47
Riordan 94 VC 68
SF and Mitty still the favorites, but this will be no cakewalk as most of the scores have been close to date. Should get a better handle after round 1 of the schedule.So VC and the Irish are still win-less.......sux!
Thank Serdaprs! Future looks bright for the WCAL. SF rematch in the Jungle will be insane.Jordan, I think you mean also rather than other sophomores. SI and Bellarmine also have some very good sophs who play a lot of minutes and contribute. It seems like a very good class.
Just bring signs that say "66-45".“I feel bad for Riordan -- they are playing us next,” Sr. Padre guard Lee Jones said. “It's going to be tough for them.”
Wow! Great locker room board material for the Crusaders! Lol! Should be another wild and wacky game at the Jungle!
http://prep2prep.com/story.aspx?ArticleID=8326
I see that SI's Will Emery has recently committed to Dartmouth. Apparently, he's got the brains to go along with length and ability.
Or signs that read "0-22". The Whinin Irish Football team WCAL league record over the past four seasons.Just bring signs that say "66-45".
Or signs that read "0-22". The Whinin Irish Football team WCAL league record over the past four seasons.
Looking forward to SHC/SI tonight as it will answer a lot of questions.. Is SI for real? Can SHC finally pull it all together?
It was supposed to be on The Cube. Lousy game anyway. Same old story with the defense, turnovers and refs (yes Fool-bo, they're excuses). It was 61-60 Catboxers. Refs wouldn't call a foul on the last play and disallowed a third made FT citing a "lane violation". What a crock.Watching news following President Obama's SOTU speech & channel 4 shows USF with a reporter to cover the upcoming SHC vs SI Bruce Mahoney game which annually attracts a throng of 4,000-7,000 fans at USF. Checking around & no coverage on NFHS or anywhere else for that matter[?]. I went on both schools web sites and the athlectic coverage & updates are as in the past - almost an after-thought and no info to speak of [disappointing for such a traditional rivalry game].
Here 's a tip to both schools: advertsie your teams/players and get more recognition and attention for your schools. Heck I have a subscription to NFHS that just expired & I would have signed up to see tonite's game [ie: $$ for your school if anyone is paying attention]. A bit behind the internet times & missing the boat on putting their teams "out there" [even "Wikipedia" can tell you the history of the game & what it is all about].
A typical odd and wacky game in the Jungle tonight. Serra held a slim lead throughout. Standout Padre for me was Lee Jones who was absolute money with his Steph Curry-like running floaters. He must have made 5 of them! Riordan played without key rotation players Rassam and Norman. Stansberry had a good night, but was hampered with being the one-man show with two players out and forward Jason Smith and soph James Chun saddled with foul trouble for most of the game. Smith eventually fouled out. Chun was called for a phantom technical foul that was not seen by any of the refs. Chun and a Padre were tied up and the Padre player landed with a thud. After an official's timeout - a technical was charged on Chun. WTF?!? Turning point of the game as it put the Padres up by 10 and it was too little to late for the Crusaders. Rematch at the Forum should be a good one. WCAL will be a tight race with SF, Mitty, SI, Serra, Bellarmine and RIordan fighting it out.
Watched game SI/SHC game on SF Cable 104. Although advertised at 7:30, game (hence, telecast) did not start til 8. Very entertaining game.
Irish Cheers, I had a perfect view of Alfred Hollins lane violation and the last play of the game. Hollins thought his shot was off and jumped in the lane WAY early. Of course, he was wrong. The shot was perfect. While there was contact on the final play, it was initiated by Hollins and a no call was correct.
After watching for decades I would just bet that if it were the other way around there would not have been a violation called and there would be some foul shots at the end.
No way. It was a VERY clear violation. Are you a conspiracy theorist?
I saw a replay of the lane violation from Radnich on channel 4 last night, and it was pretty clear he went in early as he thought he may have missed it. Maybe sometimes that isn't called, but it was the correct call. Just horrible timing.