Live feed

championcif75 · 2024-11-20T21:15:59-0800

Streak One said:
We picked it the first time around and a lot of big games this week. We will see if Placer can turn the tables in the playoffs

Streak thanks,yeah I can see there are some very good games…..I’ll be praying we can carry on this conversation next week.Thx again Streak.🙏🙏

1tunz1 · 2024-11-20T20:57:17-0800

bella123 said:
I will say after perusing through this thread there is some astonishing football knowledge and predictions given (myself included 🤣).

I might add I think the team that scores more will end up winning.*

*You're not gonna find that type of hard hitting out on a limb posts at CalHi or any other forum.

Us CN fans have to talk ourselves into a win.

bella123 · 2024-11-20T19:43:12-0800

bella123 said:
Defense is great, but if they are on the field alot they will wear down.

1tunz1 said:
They need to take their shots (I.e. play to win).

Rocknrolus 95361 said:
I am not looking forward to sitting in the rain. But, I think it will favor running teams.

I will say after perusing through this thread there is some astonishing football knowledge and predictions given (myself included 🤣).

I might add I think the team that scores more will end up winning.*

*You're not gonna find that type of hard hitting out on a limb posts at CalHi or any other forum.

SearsPoints · 2024-11-20T19:33:20-0800

SearsPoints Says:

10 - De La Salle
9 - Oak Ridge
8 - Carmel
7 - Riordan
6 - Windsor
5 - San Ramon Valley
4 - Rocklin
3 - St Francis
2 - St Mary's
1 - Palma

Rocknrolus 95361 · 2024-11-20T18:02:43-0800

I am not looking forward to sitting in the rain. But, I think it will favor running teams. No one is going to stop Wes Burford in the rain. Like Trying to wrestle a greased pig!

northbaybbguru · 2024-11-20T17:49:24-0800

TheHillZ said:
For four bucks a month, Cal-Hi remains one of the best values out there. Truly appreciate the effort and thought they put into their preseason rankings and accompanying narratives, even when there is cause to quibble.

Preseason Girls BB Ranks (1-15)

We continue to roll out our preseason winter basketball content on CalHiSports.com and we're doing that today with our annual preseason girls basketball state

www.calhisports.com

Preseason Girls BB Ranks (16-40)

Here's the rest of the preseason Top 40 of the best girls basketball teams from all across California. This group is led by the legendary sharpshooters from P

www.calhisports.com

Cal-Hi's Top 10 in Nor-Cal

Mitty (#2 in state)
Folsom (#9 in state)
McClatchy (#11)
O'Dowd (#13)
Carondelet (#14)
Pinewood (#16)
Acalanes (#23)
Cardinal Newman (#24)
St. Mary's (#25)
Oak Ridge (#28)

Quibble away.

Looks about right except I'd have CN behind SMS and OR. Maybe put CLET ahead of CKM also. I have CLET as the top dawg in NCS starting off...

northbaybbguru · 2024-11-20T17:39:13-0800

Streak One said:
When I think of wet grass fields and mud bowls, I always think of the Nevada Union-Monterey Trail section final at UOP. Think that was the last year they used UOP

When i think of "rain games" I immediately go to my senior year 1983 CN at Ukiah. CN on its way to an undefeated NCS championship seaon over the Brad Muster led San Marin. It rained like crzy leading up to the game...grass field. They elected to play the JV game before and destroyed the field. Couldn't see the yard lines. CN heavy favorite so they clearly did it to even out the playing field so to speak.Lol

Water over my ankles , straight mud bowl. Couldn't move... CN won on a safety on a bad snap punt 2-0.

What a memory!!

H.E.A.T. · 2024-11-20T17:38:27-0800

@Streak One MT vs redwood is not tonight . It’s Jan 20

THEOC89 · 2024-11-20T17:34:48-0800

kiddman32 said:
Back when I played in PE classes at DVC, there were a few times when the artificial turf was wet (and I sure hope it has been replaced with much better-quality stuff since then). It was obviously not a muddy mess, but it was like running on ice, no grip to turn at ALL. And when you fell, it was like ROCK. If ya slid, your skin stayed where you landed while your body kept on sliding. YIPE.

HA!!…. I remember that old DVC turf as well!!…. It was no fun!….

Definitely been replaced, DVC has a beautiful field and a nice new scoreboard…. DLS vs PITT at DVC this Friday should be quite the spectacle!….

THEOC89 · 2024-11-20T17:31:48-0800

larry legend33 said:
Agree. They've gotten super tight and conservative on offense. They have some WR with speed who can get some separation. Gentry will need to break a run or 2 as well. He's a difference maker.

I don't think SRV will have an easy time scoring on Newman though. Get ready for a slog fest if you ask me. The forecast keeps calling for inches of rain. None of the game plan may matter other than who can hold onto the ball.

I agree!….. And when I say I have a hard time seeing CN put up points, I am thinking like a 14-7 type of game especially with the weather….

I think this plays out like the SRV vs SI game but with less points…. 🤣

rwccaptain42 · 2024-11-20T16:09:55-0800

FBAddict said:
I wonder if Santa Clara U. JV is the current day Bellarmine?

Please tell me you’re a HS history teacher. Bless you

kiddman32 · 2024-11-20T14:02:23-0800

Back when I played in PE classes at DVC, there were a few times when the artificial turf was wet (and I sure hope it has been replaced with much better-quality stuff since then). It was obviously not a muddy mess, but it was like running on ice, no grip to turn at ALL. And when you fell, it was like ROCK. If ya slid, your skin stayed where you landed while your body kept on sliding. YIPE.

kiddman32 · 2024-11-20T13:47:55-0800

Wow, great work!!

Cal 14 · 2024-11-20T12:44:05-0800

North:

1. Still uncertain as to where the committee might place Folsom, due to common opponent (Serra) with the top CCS teams. One thing to watch is how their Calpreps rating will progress in a slightly stripped-down SJS D-1, relative to the other divisions in this region.

2. The top divisions in the NCS, CCS, and CS will have their champions after this weekend. Some shuffling could be the result.

3. In a review of McClymonds situation, I feel that their rating is artificially low. Two results in particular are drags (Berean Christian and Fremont). My guess is that their true rating should probably be in the mid-20s. Plus, as speculated in last week's list, not so sure the CIF voters would place them lower than this, considering their history.

South:

1. A number of high seeds went down last week in this region. In some brackets, the highest remaining seed is #5.

2. It amazes me that Narbonne has been allowed to continue in this year's playoffs after all of the findings involving ineligible players. I don't think this would have happened in many other CIF sections.

3. Surprising how many teams in lower divisions have passed those in higher after last week's round of games.

Overall:

1. I was able to do some finagling and move every team away from an opponent from within the same section. Luckily, in doing this, none of the new matchups are blowouts on paper.

2. There was a lot of shuffling in the middle divisions, while those in the upper and lower remained fairly stable. Even in cases where ratings shifted, the upper and lower matchups largely remained the same.

1tunz1 · 2024-11-20T12:39:48-0800

larry legend33 said:
Agree. They've gotten super tight and conservative on offense. They have some WR with speed who can get some separation. Gentry will need to break a run or 2 as well. He's a difference maker.

I don't think SRV will have an easy time scoring on Newman though. Get ready for a slog fest if you ask me. The forecast keeps calling for inches of rain. None of the game plan may matter other than who can hold onto the ball.

The wet weather should be an advantage to CN, then.

Cal 14 · 2024-11-20T12:29:29-0800

Once again, these are not predictions as to who I think will win each division, but rather a preview of what the bowl landscape could end up being. The teams listed are the highest remaining seeds in their respective division. Commentary once again will be a reply to this list.

Open Division (Section Division, Calpreps ratings)

North: De La Salle (NCS Open, 67.0) vs. South: Mater Dei (SS D-I, 102.0)

D-1AA

North: Clovis East (CS D-IAA, 62.6) vs. Folsom (SJS D-1, 59.9)

South: Murrieta Valley (SS D-2, 62.8) vs. Lincoln (SDS Open, 61.0)

D-1A

North: Pittsburg (NCS D-1, 54.9) vs. St. Ignatius (CCS Open, 47.2)

South: Simi Valley (SS D-3, 50.5) vs. San Marcos (SDS D-I, 43.9)

D-2AA

North: Rocklin (SJS D-2, 44.1) vs. St. Francis (CCS D-I, 43.8)

South: St. Bonaventure (SS D-4, 43.0) vs. Bakersfield Christian (CS D-II, 31.3)

D-2A

North: Twelve Bridges (SJS D-4, 37.0) vs. Wilcox (CCS D-II, 33.6)

South: Bakersfield (CS D-IA, 32.9) vs. Palos Verdes Estates (SS D-5, 32.5)

D-3AA

North: Bradshaw Christian (SJS D-6, 30.5) vs. Liberty (NCS D-2, 29.8)

South: Narbonne (LACS Open, 26.0) vs. Dana Hills (SS D-6, 24.1)

D-3A

North: Oakdale (SJS D-3, 27.9) vs. McClymonds (OS, 15.6)

South: University City (SDS D-II, 20.9) vs. West Torrance (SS D-7, 18.0)

D-4AA

North: Pleasant Valley (NS D-2, 23.1) vs. Acalanes (NCS D-3, 18.1)

South: Shafter (CS D-IV, 18.7) vs. Highland (SS D-9, 16.6)

D-4A

North: Hughson (SJS D-5, 20.8) vs. St. Vincent de Paul (NCS D-5, 16.3)

South: Porterville (CS D-II, 18.5) vs. Serrano (SS D-8, 15.2)

D-5AA

North: Carmel (CCS D-III, 15.5) vs. Ukiah (NCS D-4, 12.2)

South: Central (SDS D-III, 7.5) vs. St. Anthony (SS D-10, 6.6)

D-5A

North: Winters (NS D-4, 8.4) vs. Arcata (NCS D-6, 5.5)

South: El Capitan (SDS D-IV, 2.0) vs. Baldwin Park (SS D-11, -0.4)

D-6AA

North: Lassen (NS D-3, 7.6) vs. Moreau Catholic (NCS D-7, 4.9)

South: Bishop Union (CS D-V, -0.2) vs. Mary Star of the Sea (SS D-12, -3.1)

D-6A

North: Summerville (SJS D-7, 4.8) vs. Piedmont Hills (CCS D-IV, 0.9)

South: Eagle Rock (LACS D-I, -5.9) vs. Gahr (SS D-13, -11.4)

D-7AA

North: Lincoln (SFS, -9.9) vs. South San Francisco (CCS D-IV, -10.0)

South: Vista (SDS D-V, -17.1) vs. Arleta (LACS D-II, -22.6)

D-7A

North: Minarets (CS D-VI, -12.9) vs. Maxwell (NS, -21.6)

South: Pioneer (SS D-14, -28.8) vs. Los Angeles (LACS D-III, -40.1)

larry legend33 · 2024-11-20T12:28:48-0800

bella123 said:
True. But they are also averaging about a 14 points against the 2 best teams (MC/Windsor) they have played.

I’d expect SRV to be much closer (and better) in caliber to MC and Windsor than the BOD’s and PV’s they faced. I do have a feeling they are going to have a hard time generating alot of offense. Defense is great, but if they are on the field alot they will wear down.

Agree. They've gotten super tight and conservative on offense. They have some WR with speed who can get some separation. Gentry will need to break a run or 2 as well. He's a difference maker.

I don't think SRV will have an easy time scoring on Newman though. Get ready for a slog fest if you ask me. The forecast keeps calling for inches of rain. None of the game plan may matter other than who can hold onto the ball.

Streak One · 2024-11-20T09:00:32-0800

5-STARS
1. Alec Blair 6-foot-6 SG De La Salle (Oklahoma)
2. Jasir Renchar 6-foot-6 W Riordan (Texas A&M)
3. Semetri Carr 6-foot-0 PG Redwood (Cal)

4-STARS
4. Jalen Stokes 6-foot-5 W Dougherty Valley (UC Davis)
5. Alvin Loving 6-foot-4 SG Salesian (Yale)
6. Steven Emeneke 6-foot-10 Post Riordan (UC Irvine)
7. Mark Lavrenov 6-foot-8 PF Rocklin (Sacramento State)

3-STARS
8. Kellen Hampton 6-foot-7 SF Moreau Catholic (Pacific)
9. Gavin Sykes 6-foot-4 SG Modesto Christian (Long Beach State)
10. Anthony Moore 6-foot-5 W Lincoln-Stockton (Weber State)
11. Luke Isaak 6-foot-2 PG San Ramon Valley (UC Irvine)
12. Sir Marius Jones 6-foot-3 SG Sacramento
13. Elijah Perryman 6-foot-2 G Clayton Valley Charter (Utah State)
14. Antonio Kellogg Jr. 6-foot-3 SG Ygnacio Valley
15. Ardarius Gates 6-foot-0 PG Oakland Tech
16. Kaleb Edwards 6-foot-8 PF Oak Ridge (Alabama Football)
17. Brayden Harris 6-foot-3 SG Valley Christian-San Jose

2-STARS
18. Isaiah Ackerman 6-foot-4 W Aptos
19. Taylen Goodman 6-foot-7 PF Inderkum
20. Jaylen Valdez 6-foot-3 SG Destiny Christian
21. John Tofi 6-foot-4 SF Riordan (Cal Football)
22. Malachi Johnson 6-foot-9 Post Inderkum
23. Darrion Lilly 6-foot-4 W Weston Ranch
24. Xan Meyer-Plettner 6-foot-7 PF Oakland Tech
25. Chase Rawlins 6-foot-5 W Folsom
26. Elliot Conley 6-foot-4 W San Ramon Valley
27. Ayden Thompson 6-foot-7 Post Benicia
28. Dominic Walker 6-foot-5 W Moreau Catholic
29. Shemar Jones 6-foot-5 SG Mountain House
30. Kirby Seals 6-foot-5 SF Riordan
31. Zeke Davis 6-foot-6 SF Lincoln-Stockton
32. Kasen Krueger 6-foot-0 PG Amador Valley
33. Kaiser Bowen 6-foot-3 SG Folsom
34. Braddock Kjellesvig 6-foot-7 PF De La Salle
35. Jephte Tambala 6-foot-5 F Destiny Christian
36. Ry Atkins 6-foot-7 PF Modesto Christian (Air Force)
37. Ryder Bush 6-foot-1 PG Riordan
38. Mason Brown 6-foot-3 SG Modesto Christian
39. Danny Panda 6-foot-6 F Destiny Christian
40. Ely Willis 6-foot-4 SF Rocklin

1tunz1 · 2024-11-20T08:57:20-0800

bella123 said:
True. But they are also averaging about a 14 points against the 2 best teams (MC/Windsor) they have played.

I’d expect SRV to be much closer (and better) in caliber to MC and Windsor than the BOD’s and PV’s they faced. I do have a feeling they are going to have a hard time generating alot of offense. Defense is great, but if they are on the field alot they will wear down.

I think even in rain CN is going to have throw the ball to loosen up the defense for their running game. They need to take their shots downfield. Both the MC and Windsor game they almost exclusively ran the football. That change in game strategy is when CN started getting lower scores. I would trust my freshman QB to do what needs doing against SRV (I.e. play to win). You can Bet SRV will be using their best offensive weapon to keep throwing. For CN to compete, I think they need to also.

I can see srv putting 8 in the box on CN’S first offensive series.

Streak One · 2024-11-20T08:52:54-0800

Lot of games starting up this week (with some scrimamges and foundation games mixed in). My son wanted to put together a schedule so here are the games for this week that have been posted on MaxPreps

Boys Basketball Schedule

Central Coast Nov 20 5:30 pm Mills at San Francisco Waldorf 6:30 pm Summit Denali at FAME Nov 21 3:45 pm Drew at Kehillah 5:00 pm SHCP at Aragon 5:30 pm Monte Vista at King’s Academy 5:30 pm Harker at KIPP Esperanza 5:45 pm San Francisco Christian at Sterne 7:00 pm Valley Ch...

docs.google.com

Streak One · 2024-11-20T08:50:30-0800

Streak One said:
Here are the games for this week. Picks are due at 7:00 PM on Friday. Game of the Week is De La Salle-Pittsburg

Turlock at Oak Ridge
Grant at St. Mary’s-Stockton
Manteca at Rocklin
St. Francis vs. St. Ignatius
Menlo vs. Palma
Los Gatos at Riordan
Hollister vs. Carmel
De La Salle vs. Pittsburg
Cardinal Newman at San Ramon Valley
Windsor at Amador Valley

10. De La Salle (31-14)
9. San Ramon Valley
8. Rocklin
7,. Oak Ridge
6. Carmel
5. St. Mary's
4. Riordan
3. Amador Valley
2. St. Francis
1. Palma

Streak One · 2024-11-20T08:47:50-0800

championcif75 said:
Streak,I’m shocked my friend,I was looking forward to seeing
Placer vs Twelve Bridges 2 on the list….there must be a real good reason as to why this 2nd game (this yr) between these two programs is absent,1st game was exciting as neither teams D could stop the other,the difference being a couple Placer miscues,one of which was a pic 6….I honestly felt this 2nd game was deserving of being on this list as was the 1st,even more so now since it’s the semi game of the D4 playoffs.Streak,plz don’t take my post here anything more than I am just surprised this game is not on the list,that’s all! Thanks for the great job you do….just don’t let this happen again!😂😂😂😂😂😂

We picked it the first time around and a lot of big games this week. We will see if Placer can turn the tables in the playoffs

bella123 · 2024-11-20T08:24:26-0800

1tunz1 said:
CN is averaging 35 ppg this year. They put up a 56-0 performance against BOD, who just beat Monte Vista. I’m pretty sure SRV coaches and players aren’t joking around in practice this week.

True. But they are also averaging about a 14 points against the 2 best teams (MC/Windsor) they have played.

I’d expect SRV to be much closer (and better) in caliber to MC and Windsor than the BOD’s and PV’s they faced. I do have a feeling they are going to have a hard time generating alot of offense. Defense is great, but if they are on the field alot they will wear down.

FBAddict · 2024-11-20T08:14:08-0800

CCSFB98 said:
1922
LOSS San Jose State, 43-0
LOSS Mountain View, 6-0
TIE Santa Clara High, 6-6
LOSS Santa Clara U. JV, 21-14
LOSS Mountain View, 19-13
Head Coach: Eichelberger
Record: 0-4-1

I wonder if Santa Clara U. JV is the current day Bellarmine?

Live feed

Live feed

Show only:

NCP Pick'em: Playoffs Week 2

Very Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions - 2024

Very Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions - 2024

NCP Pick'em: Playoffs Week 2

Very Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions - 2024

Cal-Hi NorCal Rankings

Preseason Girls BB Ranks (1-15)

Preseason Girls BB Ranks (16-40)

Playoff Weather - 11/22 and 11/23/2024

This Week's Schedule

Playoff Weather - 11/22 and 11/23/2024

Very Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions - 2024

Riordan's Big Moment

Playoff Weather - 11/22 and 11/23/2024

This Week's Schedule

Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions

Very Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions - 2024

Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions

Very Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions - 2024

Sticky

Player Rankings: Boys Basketball 2025 Top 40

Very Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions - 2024

This Week's Schedule

Boys Basketball Schedule

NCP Pick'em: Playoffs Week 2

NCP Pick'em: Playoffs Week 2

Very Early Look at the CIF Bowl Divisions - 2024

Riordan's Big Moment

Filter

Live feed

Live feed

Sticky Player Rankings: Boys Basketball 2025 Top 40

Filter

Sticky

Player Rankings: Boys Basketball 2025 Top 40