Paul,You have the Kings Academy At 8-2. What if they beat Sacred Heart prep?Kings would be 9-1 And SHP Would be 7-3.Would Kings then be division 1?Or would they still be Division 2?
The 6th place finisher in the WCAL will make the CCS play-offs. If SHC were to finish 6th they would likely end up with 23 points (4 for two wins, 10 for schedule, 1 for playing the WCAL champ, 6 bonus points for playing CA top 100 teams (Serra, VC, SI) and 2 for playing top 150 teams (SF, Mitty). They are currently ranked 33rd in the CCS but wins over Riordan who is #25 and Bellamrine who is #16 would likely elevate them into the 20-25 range for section rankings and give them a final point total in the low 40's which would be a low seed in division 3 or a high seed in division 4.Question for pal booster. If SH beats Bellermine and Riordan ang finishes 6th in the WCAL would they qualify for CCS playoffs
CCS Top 10
Same 10 teams in the top 10 but SI made a big jump and St. Francis dropped after SI's win.
Serra 1 (1) 3 14
Valley Christian 2 (2) 4 23
Wilcox 3 (4) 17 75
Saint Ignatius 4 (7) 18 79
Menlo-Atherton 5 (6) 21 90
Half Moon Bay 6 (5) 29 112
St. Francis 7 (3) 30 116
Mitty 8 (10) 35 128
Sacred Heart Prep 9 (9) 38 131
Los Gatos 10 (8) 41 134
DI
8. Mitty 5-5 63.5 at 1. Serra 10-0 85.5
5. Saint Ignatius 7-3 70 at 4. Menlo-Atherton 7-3 71.5
6. St. Francis 5-5 67 at 3. Wilcox 8-2 71.5
7. Half Moon Bay 10-0 63.5 at 2. Valley Christian 9-1 77
SI's win over St. Francis moved them from 8th to 5th and dropped SF from 3rd to 6th. Mitty moved up in the CCS rankings based on their close lose to Serra and jumped from DII to DI. Los Gatos moved down to DII.
DII
8. San Benito 6-4 53 at 1.Los Gatos 9-1 63
5. Palo Alto 7-3 57 at 4. Kings Academy 8-2 57
6. Palma 8-2 54 at 3. Salinas 9-1 60
7. Bellarmine 3-7 54 at 2. Sacred Heart Prep 8-2 62
Bellarmine jumps up from DIII to DII based on 28-27 2TO win over Riordan. Oak Grove drops from DII to DIII.
DIII
8. Soquel 9-1 40 at 1. Oak Grove 8-2 51.5
5. Leland 6-4 46 at 4. Mountain View 7-3 46.5
6. Branham 10-0 45.5 at 3. Seaside 10-0 49.5
7. Aptos 5-5 45 at 2. Live Oak 9-1 51
Seaside jumped from 5 to 3 trading places with Leland. Soquel moved from DIV to DIII and Burlingame moved down.
DIV
8. Willow Glen 9-1 31.5 at 1. Monte Vista Christian 7-2 39.1
5. Terra Nova 4-6 34 at 4. Carmel 5-5 35.5
6. San Mateo 7-3 33.5 at 3. Burlingame 5-5 37.5
7. North Monterey County 8-2 33.5 at 2. Hillsdale 7-3 38.5
This division showed the most change due to the two biggest upsets of the weekend. Gunn beat Saratoga who was a heavy favorite and knocked them from DIV to DV. Menlo beat Carlmont and knocked Carlmont from the projected play-off field and they were replaced by Overfelt in DV as the final at-large team. North Monterey County and Willow Glen were bumped from Dv to DIV.
Division V
8, Mount Pleasant 7-3 18 at 1. Overfelt 6-4 31
5. Gunn 9-1 25.5 at 4. Monterey 6-4 27
6. Santa Teresa 4-6 23 at 3. Mills 9-1 29
7. Pacific Grove 6-4 20 at 2. Saratoga 8-2 30
Mills was added to the field based on their 19-6 win over Jefferson and current projection to replace Jefferson as PAL-Lake champion. Gunn is projected as Co-Champion of the El Camino and replaced Monta Vista.
Again, it's the equity formula. So CCS, by rule, will not be sending its top teams to the regionals.
Top 5 CCS teams today are Serra - Valley Christian - Wilcox - Saint Ignatius - Menlo Atherton
Should the "current" number one seeds in each division win, CCS will send Serra (ranked 1 in CCS now) - Los Gatos (ranked 10 in CCS) - Oak Grove (ranked 21) - Monte Vista Christian (ranked 24) - and Overfelt (ranked 32) to the Nor Cal play-in games.
And if the current eight seeds in each division were to win in major upsets, CCS will send Mitty (ranked 8) - Hollister (ranked 15), Soquel (ranked 26), Willow Glen (ranked 36) and Mt Pleasant (ranked 71) to the Nor Cal play-in games. So the team ranked 71st in CCS could make it to the Nor Cal game.
Which is ridiculous. Are the other sections using the same criteria, or is it just the CCS using the “everyone gets a trophy” mentality?
How would you set up the playoffs?
I would mirror what the other sections in NorCal do. As long as everyone is using the same criteria I have no problem. Short of that I would get rid of the Open Division and have everyone play at their enrollment level.
I would mirror what the other sections in NorCal do. As long as everyone is using the same criteria I have no problem. Short of that I would get rid of the Open Division and have everyone play at their enrollment level.
Unfortunately my gut, and the numbers seem to support it, says the new equity is to allow under performing top tier teams to compete in D4 and D5, where if successful in the CCS Playoffs, would lead to playing enrollment based schools in Norcal and State Competition. It would be a shame to see an 8-2 B Division team at home, while a 3-7 A Division team plays in D5.
Hopefully the PCAL fixes the erroneous B Division allocations for Mission(3) and Cypress(1) and returns to the CCS guidelines of 2 per B Division. Last season Soledad got in at 3-7, while 3 other Cypress Teams had better records.
This season the Cypress actually outperformed the Mission on the field. And is almost guaranteed to have Gonzales watching Soledad in the playoffs, despite a better record and a head to head win.
Hopefully the PCAL fixes the erroneous B Division allocations for Mission(3) and Cypress(1) and returns to the CCS guidelines of 2 per B Division. Last season Soledad got in at 3-7, while 3 other Cypress Teams had better records.
This season the Cypress actually outperformed the Mission on the field. And is almost guaranteed to have Gonzales watching Soledad in the playoffs, despite a better record and a head to head win.
Top to bottom? Gonzales beat Soledad and beat North Salinas. Soledad is currently in 3rd place in Mission and played MVC very close. North county beat soquel and soquel beat Gonzales. I would say both those leagues are pretty even. With the exception of a healthy seaside.Nah, current system is fine. The Mission is better top to bottom.
Top to bottom? Gonzales beat Soledad and beat North Salinas. Soledad is currently in 3rd place in Mission and played MVC very close. North county beat soquel and soquel beat Gonzales. I would say both those leagues are pretty even. With the exception of a healthy seaside.
Having watched Calpreps rankings closely I have noticed a few problems with their system. This would largely be an academic issue, but since the CCS is relying on the rankings as of 10 AM on the Sunday following the season this issues may have an impact on which teams are selected for the play-offs and/or what divisions and seeds are given to teams. I have noticed three issues over the past few weeks.
1) There are a few scores that are reported incorrectly and often take a few days for corrections to be made. For example, last week the Serra-Mitty game was originally recorded by Calpreps to be 41-21. On Sunday afternoon they finally made the adjustment to the actual score of 35-29. This small change boosted Mitty two positions in the section rankings which is worth two points (and two other teams lost points by moving down in the rankings. These small change moved seedings and divisions for three teams.
2) For some unexplained reason there is some adjustment Calpreps makes midweek to their rankings. For example, As of Monday last week Menlo-Atherton was ranked 3rd in CCS and 79th in the state. Wilcox was ranked fourth in the CCS and 80th in the state. For some reason midweek this was reversed with Wilocx being third and 79th and MA being 4th and 80th. Again Wilcox gained a point and MA lost a point from this change.
3) There is something very strange in this weeks rankings. Going into this week Sacred Heart Prep was ranked #10 in CCS and #143 in the state and had a Calprep rating of 26.2. They played Kings Academy who was ranked #11 in CCS and about 160 in the state with a Calprep rating of 22.3. Calpreps projected a 28-17 SHP win. The result of the game was SHP won 24-9.
In Calpreps today this result has dropped Kings Academy's ranking from 22.3 to 20.2 and dropped them from #11 in the section to #12 which is somewhat expected. The part that I can't explain or understand is that SHP's ranking after the win dropped from 26.2 to 19.5 and their section ranking went from #10 to #13 (behind Kings Academy who they beat by 15 points). They also dropped behind Salinas who was idle and Palma who recorded an as expected 44-16 win over Alverez (Calpreps projection was 38-14). Nothing unusual occurred among SHP's prior opponents (SI is still ranked #5 in CCS, HMB dropped a touch from #7 to #9 after their win against Sequoia, MA who is #4 won as expected, etc. As you might guess I have a lot of experience with statistics and data models and have a note into Calpreps to understand this. Maybe this week is a mistake and they will correct it or maybe they had a prior mistake that they corrected this week - but SHP has been ranked pretty much the same for the past few weeks.
Again the concern is that the CCS will be utilizing Calpreps heavily for its play-off decision making and seeding process
Top 10 after week 9 (Including Saturday results)
School CCS Rank (last week rank) Norcal Rank State Rank
Serra 1 (1) 3 15
Valley Christian 2 (2) 4 25
Menlo-Atherton 3 (3) 17 80
Saint Ignatius 4 (5) 18 87
Wilcox 5 (4) 19 90
Mitty 6 (8) 24 98
St. Francis 7 (7) 40 133
Los Gatos 8 (9) 45 140
Half Moon Bay 9 (6) 48 160
Salinas 10 (nr) 55 176
Dropped out: Sacred Heart Prep 13 (10)
Top 5 were unchanged. Mitty moved to 6 after beating 7th ranked St. Francis. Los Gatos moved from 9 to 8 with a good win over Palo Alto. HMB dropped from 6 to 9 in the CCS rankings after a 42-13 win over Sequoia. HMB dropped from 32 to 48 in Norcal from this result and from 115 in the state to 160. Salinas jumped up from #12 to #10 as they had a forfeit win over Gilroy this week. SHP dropped out of the top 10 despite beating undefeated and #11 ranked Kings Academy 24-9 (see note in above post) and saw their norcal ranking go from 45 to 73 and state ranking drop from 143 to 221.
DI
8. Los Gatos 9-1 65 at 1. Serra 10-0 88.5
5. Saint Ignatius 7-3 70 at 4. Wilcox 8-2 70.5
6. St. Francis 4-6 68 at 3. Menlo-Atherton 7-3 72.8
7. Mitty 6-4 67.5 at 2. Valley Christian 9-1 79
Changes here were that Mitty moved from the top seed in Division II to the 7 seed in DI and HMB dropped from the 8 seed to DII. MA and Wilcox switched places this week.
DII
8. Live Oak 9-1 53 at 1. Salinas 9-1 63
5. Bellarmine 3-7 57 at 4. Sacred Heart Prep 8-2 58
6. Palo Alto 7-3 56 at 3. Palma 8-2 59
7. Kings Academy 8-2 56 at 2. Half Moon Bay 10-0 59.5
Live Oak moved up from DIII and replaced San Benito as the # 8 seed. HMB dropped down from D1. Other six teams all moved seeds.
DIII
8. Hillsdale 8-2 41.5 at 1. Branham 10-0 50.5
5. Aptos 5-5 46 at 4. San Benito 5-5 46
6. Carmel 6-4 43.5 at 3. Mountain View 7-3 47.5
7. Monte Vista Christian 8-1 43.3 at 2. Oak Grove 8-2 50
Monte Vista Christian ad Carmel moved into DIII from DIV and Seaside and Leland moved down.
DIV
8. Overfelt 7-3 31.5 at 1. Soquel 9-1 39.3
5. Seaside 8-2 35 at 4.San Mateo 8-2 35.5
6. Saratoga 8-2 34 at 3. Leland 6-4 39
7. Milpitas 3-7 33.3 at 2. Terra Nova 5-5 39
Burlingame dropped out completely as they lost 2 bonus points from SHP and HMB who dropped out of the top 150. Overfelt moved up from DV to DIV.
Division V
8, Mount Pleasant 7-3 18 at 1.Willow Glen 7-3 28.5
5. Soledad 6-4 24.8 at 4 Gunn 9-1 26.5
6. Santa Teresa 4-6 22 at 3. North Monterey County 8-2 27.8
7. Pacific Grove 6-4 20.3 at 2. Mills 9-1 28
NMC moved back into the field as an at-large.
With Santa Cruz being the only undefeated team in league play for the Cypress division how come they aren’t in this projection?
A very fair question. The Cypress League only gets one automatic berth. Santa Cruz plays at Soquel this week. The winner of this game will get the automatic berth regardless of what happens in week 10. Soquel will be favored by about a touchdown and that is why i have them in the projected play-offs. If Santa Cruz losses and then wins in the final week they will be on the bubble for an at-large berth. In the projection I ran this week they were the 8th ranked at-large team and only the top seven make the field.
The top 2 at-large teams will be the WCAL 5th and 6th place teams (projected to be St. Francis and Bellamrine), The third at-large team will be the 5th place Gabilan team - likely to be Aptos. The fourth at-large slot will likely be the third place team in the ocean division which will be the loser of the San Mateo Hillsdale game this week. the fifth at-large will go to Milpitas who will finish 5th in the Deanaza. The race for the last two at-large spots is incredibly close between North Monterey County, Willow Glen and Santa Cruz. When I ran this earlier today it was NMC 25.8, Willow Glen 25.5 and Santa Cruz 25.33 assuming NMC goes 2-0, Willow Glen 1-1 and Santa Cruz 1-1 in the last two weeks.
A Mitty win over SI would not create a big shift. They would likely switch places in DI seeding with Mitty going from the 7 seed to the 5 and SI going from the 5 seed to the 6 or 7 seed. I projected an SI win (Calpreps projects SI to win by 7). So If Mitty wins Mitty would gain 2 points from what I projected and SI would lose two points. The additional point shift would come their CCS rank. SI is currently 4th and Mitty is currently 6th - so it is reasonable to expect they might switch places and lead to another 2 point gain for Mitty and a 2 point loss for SI. Finally, the loser of this game is likely to drop from the top 100 teams in CA so the winner will lose a bonus point.If Mitty beats St. Ignatius does that change up everything big time?
I have Burlingame currently at 17.5 which is not enough to be one of the top 10 teams for a wild card. If Burlingame beats San Mateo (with their rankings today San Mateo will be a slight favorite) they will climb to 19.5 points and would likely be one of the top 10 teams considered for the 7 at large berths and would be on the bubble for one of the final spots.How come Burlingame is not in the mix? They don’t have a chance for an at-large birth if they beat San Mateo?