Don’t the refs get graded out based on a review of their work? The top rated refs get to do the biggest games? Do they have 2 separate gradings, 1 for men and another for women? Or do they just take the top rated women refs for the girls games even if there are higher rated men sitting at home? BTW, I thought the refs did a fine job in this game, just bantering about the selection process.Two losses in Texas will keep Etiwanda from national title.
That officiating crew worked two of our games -- just excellent. But the real question is why men work women's games but no women work men's games. There are two aspects:
1) If the women are good enough to work a girls' game, why aren't they good enough to work a men's game?
2) If they're not good enough, then why do the girls get them? Shouldn't the girls have the same quality of officiating as the boys? If CIF is saying female officials aren't qualified for boys' state games, then they shouldn't be working girls' games.
Most refs in the bay area never played basketball.My guess is their are more men referees than women referees. just as their are more men players than women players. Refs come from previous players.
Numbers. There are far more men who ref than women. Also, a lot of men don't want to do girls games.Two losses in Texas will keep Etiwanda from national title.
That officiating crew worked two of our games -- just excellent. But the real question is why men work women's games but no women work men's games. There are two aspects:
1) If the women are good enough to work a girls' game, why aren't they good enough to work a men's game?
2) If they're not good enough, then why do the girls get them? Shouldn't the girls have the same quality of officiating as the boys? If CIF is saying female officials aren't qualified for boys' state games, then they shouldn't be working girls' games.
It's not the highest ranked refs or the same refs would be there every year.Don’t the refs get graded out based on a review of their work? The top rated refs get to do the biggest games? Do they have 2 separate gradings, 1 for men and another for women? Or do they just take the top rated women refs for the girls games even if there are higher rated men sitting at home? BTW, I thought the refs did a fine job in this game, just bantering about the selection process.
Thanks. But are there separate ref rankings, or are they all evaluated on the same things? Are the top refs doing girls games also among the top overall refs?It's not the highest ranked refs or the same refs would be there every year.
The games are split yearly and rotate.
The crews are from the same high school association and when the tournament starts they already know who is moving all the way to the finals.
There really isn't a ranking. 2 people assign the finals crew. 1 from the north 1 from the south.Thanks. But are there separate ref rankings, or are they all evaluated on the same things? Are the top refs doing girls games also among the top overall refs?
Also, it makes sense if a ref has been doing girls games all year to have them do girls games in Sacto. It would be ludicrous to have some guy who’s never reffed a girls game get assigned on in a state championship game, even if he was the highest ranked ref available. A lot more goes into these assignments than first appears.
The official is qualified. But for optics they would rather have women working the girls games. And there are far less women officiating then men.Most of the refs I know played in high school, at least. David Vann, who does NCS game, is the second all-time leading scorer at St. Mary's College and was drafted by the Warriors.
My point about officiating is this: If an official is qualified enough to work a girls' state championship game, that official should be qualified enough to work a boys' state championship game. If not, why are the girls getting inferior officials? Yes, there are more male officials, so then one would expect more men to work state title games. (Of course there are some excellent female officials.)
you have coached hundreds of girls who are now women. how many officiate?I agree about the optics. And it's true in the NCAAs just as it is in high school: If there aren't enough qualified women to do men's championship games, then why should those women who aren't qualified be doing women's championship games? The women's/girls' teams are the ones impacted.
at the ncaa and wnba also the rules are different. as well as the play obviously.Very true about qualified women moving fast. They don't stick around long -- just like coaches.
And it's also true women's games are easier to officiate. Less speed and explosiveness.
Just a reminder: Even with their best player healthy and playing, Mitty lost the Open title game to Etiwanda in 2023 and 2024. There is no guarantee they would have won this time with her in the lineup.Super impressed w/Mitty. W/o their best player and unable to shoot, kept the game close and respectable. Fun up and down game. I'm guessing Mitty shot 20 for 80. Didn't see any numbers the whole game. Am I close?
Certainly no guarantee of a win, in fact they still probably lose. But it would give them a much better chance.Just a reminder: Even with their best player healthy and playing, Mitty lost the Open title game to Etiwanda in 2023 and 2024. There is no guarantee they would have won this time with her in the lineup.