I think the problem (or perception) is that you have section winners being seeded at bottom of higher brackets and people who didn't even make the finals being a top 4 seed in same or lower brackets. While I can't figure out the rhyme or reason, there has to be some method to the madness.
Open and D1 are loaded, as they should be and agree with clay, someone has to be the sacrificial lamb. But pulling up a D4 runner up to D3 and the D5 champion to top d3 seed, seems stupid. Branson should have stayed 4 and university should have not gone higher than 4. I can't imagine how tedious this process is and frustrating for coaches and the commissioners to get this "right"
Open and D1 are loaded, as they should be and agree with clay, someone has to be the sacrificial lamb. But pulling up a D4 runner up to D3 and the D5 champion to top d3 seed, seems stupid. Branson should have stayed 4 and university should have not gone higher than 4. I can't imagine how tedious this process is and frustrating for coaches and the commissioners to get this "right"