http://static.psbin.com/f/5/s2ekwbs4e3rbt9/bkbgirlsd1bracket_17.pdf
Somebody really doesn't want Bside to play SMS
Somebody really doesn't want Bside to play SMS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree that Brookside Christian deserved a #5 seed--definitely not a #7. They got robbed. I think the selection committee really favors teams that play in a league, especially strong leagues. I was very surprised that Oak Ridge (with 9 losses), received a #3 seed. But then again, I'm not surprised because the Sierra Foothill League is the strongest league in the SJS (large newer schools in developing areas with high income levels) and Oak Ridge came in first place in the Sierra Foothill League.Shame they set this up so that BC has to potentially beat Edison, MC at MC, OR at OR
just for a shot a SMS.... I thought BSide would get a number 4 or 5 seed....
Agree! Oak Ridge has always received favorable seedings the past several years. They are the 2nd closest high school to MaxPreps headquarters, but I'm sure that has nothing to do with it.The numbers may back it up, but having Oak Ridge has the No. 3 seed doesn't pass the eye test for me. I think Lincoln and Folsom are better than them.
The best question is why wasn't Lincoln number 2 because they was the only team to beat number 1 seed SMS. McClatchy should have been number 3 seed then Oak Ridge should have been 4. Like they say "Money talk and _ _ walk."
The first phase of the seedings is how you finish in your league, then if you dont make it they look at max preps rankings. The section committee will then move teams around to try and avoid same league opponent match ups in the first and second round. Certainly potential "gate matchups" are always discussed. League winner will always get a higher seed then a second place team in that same league (oak ridge won the sfl and folsom came in second) Personally i would prefer to see the old power rating system come back, because the top three teams in a league going to the playoffs is basically saying all leagues are equal. Also under the power ratings system you knew what division you were in going into the season.Who does the SJS seeding? I thought they got rid of the formula, but this looks like it was cranked out by an antiquated software program.
I think you mis understood my comment, i was comparing Oak Ridge with Folsom who are in the same league. The committee will look and determine how they want to seed teams but they are consistent with how they seed teams in the same league, they generally go in order. As far as Lincoln goes i could not tell you why they got or didnt get a specific seed and how their overall body of work compares to Oak Ridge. I did not look at Lincoln's non league schedule so i could not tell you about that, i do know that Oak Ridge played some very good teams in non league. As a whole i think the SFL is a stronger league than Lincoln's league top to bottom, but that being said if the committee was looking at Oak Ridge and Lincoln and deciding how to seed them i do not know what their rationale is in why one got a higher seedEarthquake
If that's true why didn't Lincoln get set 2. Lincoln in the rankings is higher then Oak Ridge. So I guess we can throw that theory away !!!!!!!! Name a signific win that Oak Ridge has better then Lincoln ??? Maxprep ranking has Lincoln high the Oak Ridge and so does every other ranking. McClatchy has the same think ranking and no signific win.
Can we have the real way how seeding goes!!! That THE REASON why the State have another COMMITTEE FOR SEEDING FOR NORCAL!!!
ClayThanks ... so all the first-place teams are slotted in the top seeds, then all the second-place teams and so on.
SJS has always had this goofy attitude towards leagues, as if they were all created equal, and at one point, a team that was 24-2 in a particular league was no better than a team that was 2-24, according to the power rankings.
I agree with you Respect. Why did Lincoln fall all the way to 4? Now possible rematch against SMS in semi-finals instead of finals. Also Brookside got screwed just like McClatchy did last year with #7 seed (had to go to OakRidge). McClatchy gets screwed again this year because have to play Brookside in toughest 2nd round matchup. Someone in section office doesn't like McClatchy.
Should have been:
1.St Mary's
2.Lincoln
3.McClatchy
4.OakRidge
5.Brookside
6.St Francis
7.Folsom (only team that was not league champion)
If they kept Oak Ridge and Folsom on opposite sides, they should have kept St Mary's and Lincoln opposite also!Lincoln is another team that has always gotten the shaft in respect to the Seedings, but at least they gave them a 4th seed this year so at least they do have the opportunity to make the final four. Last year they considered them as a second place team even though they won their conference. So perhaps that might have influenced their rating this year but to a lesser degree. Also they will be at home the first two games. Their gym has some weird sight lines which makes it hard for teams that are not used to the gym in respect to out side shooting.
I do think I can see their reasoning ( though probably faulty ) I think they made a lot of adjustments to keep Oak Ridge and Folsom in opposite brackets. If they over rated Oak Ridge that would extend to Folsom because the rolled Oak Ridge in their last game. Lincoln is only technically in the same league as SMS so they felt OK keeping them in the same side of the bracket. Or perhaps the committee was worried that Folsom might release some of their prisoners to pay them a visit if they didn't favor Oak Ridge and Folsom. Never the less we will see how well both Oak Ridge and Folsom do on the court.
You might be right Respect. They must want St Mary's/Lincoln and Oak Ridge/McClatchy semifinal games. Both would have bigger crowds. $$$$Earthquake
Seeding is everything when it comes to playoffs. The road is usually easier for the 1 and 2 seed but not this year. McClatchy has the harder route with 4 lose thenot Oak Ridge with 9 loses. Somebody drop the ball or major league bias. But we all now money talks and __ walks!!!! Look at the bracket on 2 and 3 side. The 2 side has all the scrappy, run and gun teams. The 3 side have that slower methodical type to the game.
It's All about the Benjamin's !!!!!!!!!!!
Must be some serious league bias then. Because Oak Ridge and Folsom definitely seem to be given higher seedings than they should have. And both given easier paths. Brookside would give Oak Ridge problems with their speed. Oak Ridge has played tough non-league schedule but has lost all of the tougher games. Should match up well with St Francis though.
If you take a look at the D-1 matchups, with the exception of the 8-9 seed i think most of these match ups in the first round are a reasonable distance. Costs are a factor. Not every school provides transportation so travel logistics are considered. You will never please everyone. My personal opinion is i wish the SJS would consider an open division in the sections similar to what the CCS has, everyone that goes to the open is guaranteed a spot in Nor Cals either in the open or their division. Look at this year, as a basketball fan wouldn't it be fun to see an 8 team bracket of 8 quality teams all that will advance? That also opens up opportunities for other schools to potentially experience a deeper run in the playoffs which could generate more interest in basketball from kids that will make the overall game better.EARTHQUAKE
If they wast trying to keep team spread apart then why in the first round they have 4 Stockton teams playing against each other. Sound like theyou try to get rid of the scrappy teams that play physical. I guess it to soften the field some what.
No don't think so.But can they beat MC to even get a chance to play OR
IMO Brookside would beat Oakridge.
I've said all along from the beginning of the season that Oakridge was overrated. Too much love for the bigs, don't have the guards......Bigs are a luxury in HS. Guards are a NECESSITY.
Must be some serious league bias then. Because Oak Ridge and Folsom definitely seem to be given higher seedings than they should have. And both given easier paths. Brookside would give Oak Ridge problems with their speed. Oak Ridge has played tough non-league schedule but has lost all of the tougher games. Should match up well with St Francis though.