“They’re always good on paper but seem to always underachieve come February.”
Please explain. Are you calling the Coach a underachiever or players in the past, or are you calling last years group of girls underachievers?
I’m just wondering because that argument makes no sense to me. This group of players stands on their own and deserves a chance to make their own history. I don’t see how history has any bearing on what they can or can’t accomplish.
I guess you aren’t watching the World Series this year or the Raptors winning the NBA championship last year.
Have you followed or seen Cal High play recently? The last 5-6 years since Jeff has taken over, they've been LOADED with talent (much more than 90% of the teams out there), won a lot of games and nothing to show for it. I think the best they've finished is quarterfinals of NCS and a couple first round exits.
With all those athletes (and they have had some darn good ones) they should have had a lot more to show. I don't know who's fault it is but it ALWAYS falls on the shoulders of the person in charge of the program.