The bottom line is the SJS rewards teams with Inflated records and punishes teams with 10 or more losses, it’s just a reality for the SJS so do you play for the playoffs or do you play to make the people on this board happy.
The bottom line is the SJS rewards teams with Inflated records and punishes teams with 10 or more losses, it’s just a reality for the SJS so do you play for the playoffs or do you play to make the people on this board happy.
Because CP3 and James Harden have always been so clutch in the playoffs, right?If CP3 had not gotten hurt the Warriors in my opinion where beat
What??Because CP3 and James Harden have always been so clutch in the playoffs, right?If CP3 had not gotten hurt the Warriors in my opinion where beat
CW Golden Eagles & Clay
My enrollment is about 2000 kids. No funds for feeder programs get an average of 1/2 kids that have real basketball experience coming in as a frosh... ANY kid with experience that is good in the area IMMEDIATELY is getting school paid for by SMS. I tried..... well started a feeder this year. and people from our community couldn't even pay normal fees to be able to run a tournament.
Private schools that can offer such things should be in their own league.
So i think its a difference of location and money...
I LOVE the fresno basketball culture but everyone isn't as lucky to have a whole city on the same page.
MY 2 cents.
You’re crazy if you don’t think St. Mary’s Miti and all the big time private schools don’t sponsor players. True enough they do not call it an athletic scholarship but it is definitely happening under a different name. You Sir are living in a bubble.CW Golden Eagles & Clay
My enrollment is about 2000 kids. No funds for feeder programs get an average of 1/2 kids that have real basketball experience coming in as a frosh... ANY kid with experience that is good in the area IMMEDIATELY is getting school paid for by SMS. I tried..... well started a feeder this year. and people from our community couldn't even pay normal fees to be able to run a tournament.
Private schools that can offer such things should be in their own league.
So i think its a difference of location and money...
I LOVE the fresno basketball culture but everyone isn't as lucky to have a whole city on the same page.
MY 2 cents.
Let me first commend who ever is responsible on the excellent job that is being done with the girls basketball program Edison High. It is very difficult in a school system that is geared not to excellence but mediocrity. A program such as exists at SMS would be an impossibility at any Stockton Unified or most other public schools for that matter. This is due to a variety of reasons with funding being only a small part.
Your blanket statement about any player with experience that is good in the area having their school paid for by SM is based on rumor and little fact. The girls basketball players education is paid for by their parent and many times at great personal sacrifice. Such as the single mother who worked two jobs and often couldn't go to see her daughters play.
As far as I know there has been one isolated exception to this and that was by a private individual friend of a family who initially helped a girl who's parents had financial difficulties and could no longer afford the tuition. That same person has helped one needy player each year since. This is a far cry from the accusations of good players getting their school paid for. This is only in respect to the girls basketball program, I don't know about the other programs.
I have been following the program for about 10 years mostly because of the vitriol that was spewed in the Stockton Record by SM detractors It fueled my interest and that got me following the program. I found that the detractors could be categorized into separated factions with different motivational agenda's, only one of which was the resentment that public schools had for the success of the private schools. Ultimately they wanted to use the private schools as a scapegoat for their own failures.
The problem is Stockton Unified and other school districts like it. They have let down both their teachers and students alike. You example of how hard it is to try to create a program that produces excellence is an example of that. Private schools are not the problem but a school system that settles for less.
What you and other seem to forget is that every student who goes to public school has their education paid for. So why should a private school giving a student financial aid ( if and when it does happen ) be such an advantage to drawing a student into a program? Why because it reflects the inferiority of the public school system.
There is no reason for the public schools being inferior to private schools because the majority of private schools spend less per student than the public ones. That pretty much makes a statement about what this is all about. The money the public schools miss out on from those student who attend private schools.
SMS, MITTY, SI, SHC, DLS....private schools that are pretty good at just about every sport. And I can understand why the publics get upset. Heck, Mitty had a shot at multiple national championships this last yr. But those are just a couple in Norcal.... Where are the rest?
Just in the NCS....
Salesian great in basketball...are they good in anything else?
St Marys Albany?
CN? Im a CN guy and all I can remember is them winning football and girls basketball this last year(league titles)....Did they win any other sport?
Marin Catholic? football
Justin Siena?
BOD? Football and basketball....how are they in other sports?
Moreau Catholic? boys basketball
Rincon Valley Christian?
St Vincent?
give me time and I can probably find another 10-15 that didn't win crap...
My point being is its not a guarantee that you are any good in sports if u private...
Overall public Folsom is more successful in their sports programs than any above on this list
There are a few DOMINANT private schools FOR SURE....but that's only 5 or 6 out of 600...the rest are all very competitive within their own divisions with the publics.
And competitive equity in the state playoffs are supposed to take care of any inequities...
****Im sure some of the private schools mentioned above have won some titles this last year..my point being they arent winning everything...not even close...
The privates will sponsor/scholarship/financial aid STUDENTS for sure....but that doesn't mean that ALL ATHLETES are on scholarship...that's simply not true. And its also NOT true that financial aid is ONLY given to great athletes. There are plenty of ACADEMIC only students who are given help also. Often times the prospective family just need to ask.
There are many roads a young person can take to reach college. The path may be different but the final destination is the same.
Who's to say that one is better or more just than the other? Why shouldn't a special skill be acknowledged be it a sport, an instrument or an exceptional brain?
I believe...or rather I KNOW that EVERY private school (be it SMS, CLET, MITTY, CN, SHC, SI, MC or any # of other less athletically motivated private schools) has some kind of SCHOLARSHIP ENDOWMENT and how they use it and who they give it to is for those schools to decide.
Public school families don't pay anything to send their kids to high school. How is it any different if a family wants to send their kids to a private and takes advantage of an Endowment, scholarship or financial aid package that is available? That seems (to me) like good parenting to check out your child's options.
So give me the names or even the numbers of girls basketball players in the last five years that had their school fee's paid for. I would say 5 different players, who shared one private scholarship over five years. One was even a player who got little court time. I am not talking about Mitti or the other private schools only St. Mary of Stockton. That was the school Vikecoach mentioned and was to his blanket statement that I responded too. Am I wrong? If so you can enlighten me via private message if you do not want to do so in this public forum.You’re crazy if you don’t think St. Mary’s Miti and all the big time private schools don’t sponsor players. True enough they do not call it an athletic scholarship but it is definitely happening under a different name. You Sir are living in a bubble.
"MAN" You are soooooo deep"I mentioned that it was my interest in all the negative accusation levied at the girls basketball program and their coach that impelled me to investigate and follow the program. This resulted in my calling to task the detractors and accusers. Well it didn't take much to eliminate their arguments and expose their real motivations which were derived not from actual objective assessments, rather from some personal agenda or motivated from some belief in promoting a philosophic social engineering educational agenda that necessitates mediocrity."
Translation from all of that: I love to hear myself talk #captainsaveaschool #mycapeisinthecleaners #getoveryourself
SMS, MITTY, SI, SHC, DLS....private schools that are pretty good at just about every sport. And I can understand why the publics get upset. Heck, Mitty had a shot at multiple national championships this last yr. But those are just a couple in Norcal.... Where are the rest?
Just in the NCS....
Salesian great in basketball...are they good in anything else?
St Marys Albany?
CN? Im a CN guy and all I can remember is them winning football and girls basketball this last year(league titles)....Did they win any other sport?
Marin Catholic? football
Justin Siena?
BOD? Football and basketball....how are they in other sports?
Moreau Catholic? boys basketball
Rincon Valley Christian?
St Vincent?
give me time and I can probably find another 10-15 that didn't win crap...
My point being is its not a guarantee that you are any good in sports if u private...
Overall public Folsom is more successful in their sports programs than any above on this list
There are a few DOMINANT private schools FOR SURE....but that's only 5 or 6 out of 600...the rest are all very competitive within their own divisions with the publics.
And competitive equity in the state playoffs are supposed to take care of any inequities...
****Im sure some of the private schools mentioned above have won some titles this last year..my point being they arent winning everything...not even close...
Chat with the public school folks in the Central Coast Section. The WCAL is the elephant in the powder room. It dominates most sports in both boys and girls competition. It is an athletic behemoth that dwarfs the publics. Not healthy at all.
An OPEN section in basketball that allows the other "non traditional power" teams to win the D1/D2/D3/D4/D5 section titles and a multiple section playoff (Open1/2/3 etc..) formats in football. Do they do the same in other sports as well?
So it seems to me that the CCS recognizes the elephant and tries to even out the playing field for the lesser athletic schools.
Let me first commend who ever is responsible on the excellent job that is being done with the girls basketball program Edison High. It is very difficult in a school system that is geared not to excellence but mediocrity. A program such as exists at SMS would be an impossibility at any Stockton Unified or most other public schools for that matter. This is due to a variety of reasons with funding being only a small part.
Your blanket statement about any player with experience that is good in the area having their school paid for by SM is based on rumor and little fact. The girls basketball players education is paid for by their parent and many times at great personal sacrifice. Such as the single mother who worked two jobs and often couldn't go to see her daughters play.
As far as I know there has been one isolated exception to this and that was by a private individual friend of a family who initially helped a girl who's parents had financial difficulties and could no longer afford the tuition. That same person has helped one needy player each year since. This is a far cry from the accusations of good players getting their school paid for. This is only in respect to the girls basketball program, I don't know about the other programs.
I have been following the program for about 10 years mostly because of the vitriol that was spewed in the Stockton Record by SM detractors It fueled my interest and that got me following the program. I found that the detractors could be categorized into separated factions with different motivational agenda's, only one of which was the resentment that public schools had for the success of the private schools. Ultimately they wanted to use the private schools as a scapegoat for their own failures.
The problem is Stockton Unified and other school districts like it. They have let down both their teachers and students alike. You example of how hard it is to try to create a program that produces excellence is an example of that. Private schools are not the problem but a school system that settles for less.
What you and other seem to forget is that every student who goes to public school has their education paid for. So why should a private school giving a student financial aid ( if and when it does happen ) be such an advantage to drawing a student into a program? Why because it reflects the inferiority of the public school system.
There is no reason for the public schools being inferior to private schools because the majority of private schools spend less per student than the public ones. That pretty much makes a statement about what this is all about. The money the public schools miss out on from those student who attend private schools.
The WCAL is probably the best sports conference in the state.
And its in the running for the best in the country.
The CCS has 'special" playoff formats set up in the sections to adjust the teams thus assuring that the WCAL doesn't just crush everyone. An OPEN section in basketball that allows the other "non traditional power" teams to win the D1/D2/D3/D4/D5 section titles and a multiple section playoff (Open1/2/3 etc..) formats in football. Do they do the same in other sports as well?
So it seems to me that the CCS recognizes the elephant and tries to even out the playing field for the lesser athletic schools.
And then of course comp equity takes over in the Norcals....so for the lesser athletic schools most of the time they don't even have to worry about the WCAL.