Didn’t see any of the game, of course the one I dont watch is finally a good competitive game (other 14-0 a few years ago was also a good game).
Pretty impressive for Folsom to find on a run they have the last few weeks. To me that points to coaching and adaptability and ability to make adjustments. Richardson and Taylor are really good coaches, but I think when they were at Folsom they didn’t know what to or refused to adjust in the games against DLS and the results were not good. The well we go for it on 4th and whatever from our own 5 all year against inferior opponent so we will keep doing it against DLS didn’t work. Doherty seems like he has learned from past games. I think
@ThunderRam has pointed out challenging yourself with a tough schedule. I full wholeheartedly agree, it’s actually good to get your dick knocked in the dirt. But the caveat is only if you use it as a chance for learning and coaching experience and take it as a look in the mirror to improve yourself. It looks like the current staff at Folsom has done that. Congrats to them and good luck. It was earned on the field and in the coaching room leading up to the game and during the game.
DLS? Well when I was briefly checking in with updates last night I see trick play and onside kick early in the game. To me that is always a tell that a coach actually is going into the game feeling his team is the underdog. I remember Lad doing it in the first STA matchup and right there that told me all I needed to know about how he felt about that match up. I do remember Bill Walsh actually being a proponent of a trick play in games early even after taking the lead. He actually thought if done at the right moment it could be a knockout blow, But I think 9 times out of 10 it’s more of a desperation move. Again this points to me thinking that Almbaugh and the staff didn’t like their match up going into this game.
The De La Sae staff is still very good, but it sounds like this year was the true separation from the past era especially with Edison retiring. The reality is it’s a no-win situation taking over for a legend. But in my opinion this era has really been known more for sloppy play, turnovers and penalties over the past several years. Especially in big games where a near perfect execution is what it will take to be competitive if you even have a chance to win the game (see past few SBG’s and the early holes as a result of miscues).
I really don’t know if this is an aberration or the future of where Norcal football is heading. Personally think Folsom can use it as a springboard to actually expand their program and take the next step, to an elite status.
DLS, well let’s face it the basic blueprint which is still better than probably 98% of high school teams is still there. But IMO this is a cross roads for the program. Is this year going to be the new norm where they might be the third of fourth best team in Norcal or is this year a one off aberration? Again the sky is not falling, they are still a great program, but right now they are not elite Nationally or even in their own backyard. This might be the chance for the Alambaugh staff to maybe separate themselves from the Lad era and create his own identity.
Do they stick with the veer? I don’t know. But I don’t think that is totally been the problem, it’s been their overall execution and precision which were their former strengths. That points back to coaching and preparing players those are mental mistakes not physical and. That is something that can be controlled and set by a staff. This year could actually be a blessing for DLS as dumb as that sounds. Goes back to getting your dick knocked in the dirt, it happened to them not once this year but a few times. Just as I pointed out the foursome staff using losing to their advantage in learning from it now it’s on the De La Salle staff they are the ones looking up work I’ll be curious to follow how they respond.