I noted the SI win for Berkeley! The thing about the WCAL is unless you have some experienced players (SENIORS) or the talent and are ready to play a tough pre-season schedule you shouldn't load up because the league is tough as it is. Every team in the WCAL year in and out is a top 25 team. So when you look at it in league alone they are playing 5 top 25 teams. The only top 25 team in the EBAL that is a top 25 team is BOD. Otherwise you run into the issue that SHC had this year. Rebuilding playing a tough schedule and missing the playoffs because the league is tougher than any other league. BOD could not win a game in the preseason and know they are going to make the playoffs because the league isn't tough.
Another thing you have to take into consideration is the familiarity of the teams in the league. It's easy to sneak up on a team in the pre-season that doesn't know you inside and out. Same way Dublin snuck up on Cardinal Newman or Oakland beating BOD. Let's also look at how many kids play college basketball from these leagues. How many kids from the EBAL are playing college ball right now? The WCAL has at least 20.
Mitty and Sacred heart have more kids playing in college than the rest of the league combined. So that's kind of a silly comparison. My contention is that THIS year, WCAL was overrated. You talk about top 25 Rankings, look who WCAL schools played in preseason (ranked)
Presentation: only played Miramonte and st. pats
Valley Christian: Played Cal
SI: Menlo,
SF: Pinewood.
Amador: Bear Creek
Dublin: Pinewood, Heritage, Cardinal Newman, Harvard Westlake
Cal: Valley Christian, Antelope, SMS
SRV: Bear Creek,
What I'm saying is how do we know they're top 25 if they don't go out and play anyone OUTSIDE the WCAL? They have a great rep, hardware to show they're the boss of Norcal, but aside from the top 2 teams, what else is there?