Pwood, Etiwanda and Long Island Lutheran going to Iolani
- By becoolpt55
- Girls Basketball
- 14 Replies
Utah Prep is a beast
OK, that makes the system work.2 divisions above or below your base division. I scanned quickly over the volleyball brackets and there are no expectations. Other than D1/Open.
Salesian is built on glue guys. They are really studs but amongst a bunch of stallions they may not show it. Such a great program.Salesians “glue” guy is Carlton Perrilliat. Having a good season on the gridiron at WR for the Pride. Potential Top 10 player as well this season.
2 divisions above or below your base division. I scanned quickly over the volleyball brackets and there are no expectations. Other than D1/Open.Good question. That didn’t do it last year, but both MC & CN are better this season. We’ll have to wait & see next weekend.
Good question. That didn’t do it last year, but both MC & CN are better this season. We’ll have to wait & see next weekend.I haven't read deep enough - will the NCS committee be able to use their equity system to move teams to a lower division than their slated division according to enrollment? If indeed if they have to populate Open/D1 slots with only D1 schools and special Open teams, you may be right. But if a weaker D1 team can be slated as a D2 team, it makes the Open division work better. If indeed CN is moved from D6 to Open, it seems you have a slot to fill from divisions above D6 - therefore you have chain reaction of slots to fill from above..
I haven't read deep enough - will the NCS committee be able to use their equity system to move teams to a lower division than their slated division according to enrollment? If indeed if they have to populate Open/D1 slots with only D1 schools and special Open teams, you may be right. But if a weaker D1 team can be slated as a D2 team, it makes the Open division work better. If indeed CN is moved from D6 to Open, it seems you have a slot to fill from divisions above D6 - therefore you have chain reaction of slots to fill from above..I don’t think it’s as easy as just picking the top 8 teams, although a real open division should be just that. Since it’s also the D1 bracket, D1 teams having good seasons like Cal & Liberty would be shut out of the postseason altogether if they aren’t put in that bracket. Same with AV & Heritage. Unless the committee would actually move them down to D2, which is not a good idea. CVC will be 6-4 after they get pummeled by DLS this week, but they should still be in the D1 field as they will have qualified for the playoffs and should be competitive.
Schools like MC, CN & San Marin can be put in a lower bracket (not D6!). In basketball, there is still a D1 bracket below the Open, but the current NCS system has them combined.
I don’t think it’s as easy as just picking the top 8 teams, although a real open division should be just that. Since it’s also the D1 bracket, D1 teams having good seasons like Cal & Liberty would be shut out of the postseason altogether if they aren’t put in that bracket. Same with AV & Heritage. Unless the committee would actually move them down to D2, which is not a good idea. CVC will be 6-4 after they get pummeled by DLS this week, but they should still be in the D1 field as they will have qualified for the playoffs and should be competitive.I wanted to wait until the standard ranking services had finished their rankings after this weekend's games. All services still have both MC and CN high in the rankings for NCS section.
The consensus is this ranking order:
DLS
Pitts
SRV
MC
CN
Some of the other ranking don't go deep enough to see other teams in the NCS rankings. Only Maxpreps and On3 go deeper. Of those services, these teams are next on the list:
El Cerritos (probably not able to qualify)
California
San Marin
Liberty (Brentwood)
Clayton Valley
Amador Valley
CalHiSports does list an additional 20 bubble teams below the state top 50. Cardinal Newman fell into that bubble list and no other team, aside from El Cerritos, is from the NCS section.
I think for CN to securely avoid Open, they need to bite another bullet with a lose to Vintage. And MC could have a challenging game with Windsor.
If somehow CN and MC can be placed in another lower division, they will cut through the other teams of that lower division like a hot knife through butter. It would only be in regionals that either team, as winners, would be properly placed according to their equity level.
Salesians “glue” guy is Carlton Perrilliat. Having a good season on the gridiron at WR for the Pride. Potential Top 10 player as well this season.24/25 Season my top10 players in alphabetical order to watch1
Top 10 Teams to Watch
- Alec Blair- De La Salle
- Alvin Loving- Salesian
- Andrew Hilman- Riordan
- Anthony Moore- Lincoln
- Elias Obenyah – Salesian
- Elijah Perryman- Clayton
- Gavin Sykes- Modesto
- Jalen Stokes – DV
- Jasir Rencher – Riordan
- Semetri Carr – Redwood
- De La Salle
- Riordan
- Salesian
- Modesto
- Dougherty Valley
- Lincoln Stockton
- Mitty
- San Ramon
- Oakland Tech
- Inderkum
Given how large the state is, if you were to consider something like this like a big company, you'd still have to have at least 6 'field offices': Far North, Bay Area, Upper Sac-Joaquin, Lower Sac-Joaquin, Greater Los Angeles, and San Diego. These would have to operate very much like the sections, although the CIF could push uniformity in the rules. I don't think you could eliminate the regions altogether.There is a governing board for the state, CIF. That is all that is needed. There is no need for “sections” with their own commissioner’s and own sets of rules. How about one level playing field for all. There is no consistency in the state.
How about one governing body? Transfer rules all applied the same. Discipline consistent across the stare. Playoffs, none of this double elimination keep playing when you lose in this section, but in this other section you lose and your season is over. That is terrible.
As someone who did work in government, I understand the idea of bloated redundancy and job security aspect, lol. Seriously there is one section that has 6 teams and they have their own commissioner, are you kidding me?
Coaches are not the schools.I personally know several coaches who can’t stand the NCS and have mentioned it several times.
Yes, we already have schools moving from one league to another due to travel concerns. I couldn't imagine their displeasure having to travel cross-state for a regular playoff game (granted, in some areas that already does happen).Okay, gotcha... Sound like we are saying the same thing. In my mind, it is better stated that instead of no sections (or section that govern themselves), we have CIF organized sections. I believe this idea would lead to a true playoff system based on a criteria that is the same for all sections and divisions so that, at playoff season, we don't have a reorganized set of divisions.
And we wouldn’t have entire sections comprised of just 6 schools, while others have more than 100.Okay, gotcha... Sound like we are saying the same thing. In my mind, it is better stated that instead of no sections (or section that govern themselves), we have CIF organized sections. I believe this idea would lead to a true playoff system based on a criteria that is the same for all sections and divisions so that, at playoff season, we don't have a reorganized set of divisions.
You stole my thunder. I was going to say that lots of people from India and China have become the majority around here in the silicon valley over the last decade or so. At my kids school they are becoming the majority and football is just not their sport of choice. I can see lots of schools dropping football or at least not support it like they have in the past.REMC,
Yes I think demographics have changed that much and the risk/fear of concussions has hurt football at the youth/hs age group over the past decade. I think long term you will see super leagues and more teams dropping football. Or the rules will drastically be different and its less "physical" which is already happening. Quite frankly there are a number of schools that should drop football as it stands. Sad indeed but that's the reality.
The east bay "whites" and "blacks" have moved up to Folsom, Elk Grove, Sacramento, El Dorado hills over the past 10-15 years. The new east bay is Indian and Chinese. They don't play football.
Okay, gotcha... Sound like we are saying the same thing. In my mind, it is better stated that instead of no sections (or section that govern themselves), we have CIF organized sections. I believe this idea would lead to a true playoff system based on a criteria that is the same for all sections and divisions so that, at playoff season, we don't have a reorganized set of divisions.What I mean is most states don't have sections that govern themselves, sometimes differently than other sections.
In most states I know, the "sections" are simply geographical separations used for playoff pairings so that you don't have teams criss-crossing the state to play tourney games.