Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think the way DLSs defense and offensive line got pushed around against Folsom is cause for concern. Depending on how the season plays out, I would mind seeing what Folsom could do in the open, versus seeking another beatdown if DLS goes down there.
But hey that's just my 2 cents.
Tough to say.Gotta love your entertainment. Now knowing folsom lost to dls I’m curious to know what you think folsom record with be if they had MDs schedule
I think the way DLSs defense and offensive line got pushed around against Folsom is cause for concern. Depending on how the season plays out, I would mind seeing what Folsom could do in the open, versus seeing another beatdown if DLS goes down there.
But hey that's just my 2 cents.
I’m sorry but you have proven to have absolutely zero knowledge of HSFB. Folsom didn’t push anything around. You tell everyone to “book it” at 42-35. Then change it to 35-27. I’m still waiting to see Folsom score 1. You think stats wins games. I have proof it doesn’t. In the end nothing you’ve said has been right. You lost all credibility with me when you were G61 and now you have lost all credibility as cashisking18. Yeah Folsom pushes DLS around to a 14-0 lose.I think the way DLSs defense and offensive line got pushed around against Folsom is cause for concern. Depending on how the season plays out, I would mind seeing what Folsom could do in the open, versus seeking another beatdown if DLS goes down there.
But hey that's just my 2 cents.
1. DLS D line gave up more yardageI didn't see the game but how exactly did the DLS defensive line get pushed around in a shutout?
Since we are talking about who had more yards in a game . The score matters. Remember Oakdale is a D4 team and put 553 yards on Folsom last year. And got out scored.1. DLS D line gave up more yardage
2. DLS O line produced less yardage
Folsom was more physical but lost turnover battle which is what mattered the most in that game.
You are correct. which makes it even more impressive that a team that gave up 500 plus to Oakdale last year, gave up 150 to DLS this year.Since we are talking about who had more yards in a game . The score matters. Remember Oakdale is a D4 team and put 553 yards on Folsom last year. And got out scored.
Since we are talking about who had more yards in a game . The score matters. Remember Oakdale is a D4 team and put 553 yards on Folsom last year. And got out scored.1. DLS D line gave up more yardage
2. DLS O line produced less yardage
Folsom was more physical but lost turnover battle which is what mattered the most in that game.
Since we are talking about who had more yards in a game . The score matters. Remember Oakdale is a D4 team and put 553 yards on Folsom last year. And got out scored.
Good call.Now you are catching onto the cash madness - you can figure out how to turn a loss into a win in almost any game.
DLS lost the battle on the lines. Both sides. Folsom more physical.
Folsom loses turnover battle. Big time.
End of story.
You cant call me letters and numbers all you want. It wont change my analysis.
Not really just calling him out on the yards v score thing. Folsom was by far the more athletic team on the field that night. Oakdale is a smaller school that doesn't have specialized athletes. One of Oakdale's D- lineman was one of the players on the tennis team. A 280 pounder on the court is an interesting and entertaining.Now you are catching onto the cash madness - you can figure out how to turn a loss into a win in almost any game.
True.I wasn't there but often times turnovers are forced by good defense, not the offense screwing up.
Lack of knowledge. For whatever reasons you fail to mention, Starting field position was hugely in favor of DLS. And your more “physical” line gave up 7 sacks. Your reaching and there’s nothing there. Joe Ngata was about the 5th best player on that field Friday night. In fact if you ask me he hurt the team with his punting more then he help as a receiver. I know he’s a great athlete but Friday night he was owned. Your trying to push stats that don’t tell the whole story.1. DLS D line gave up more yardage
2. DLS O line produced less yardage
Folsom was more physical but lost turnover battle which is what mattered the most in that game.
Clemson sure thinks so. Committed there.I guess the real question is Joe Ngata the real deal? Bigtime players always seem to show up on the bigtime stage.
That is if MD doesn't have any more illegal players.Getting back to the point - I think MD will beat BG pretty handily. If somehow BG wins, I'll have to rethink BG merits for this year.
Clemson sure thinks so. Committed there.
Offers from every major program in the country.
Agreed. He has to put in work there. He will be a small fish in a huge pond at Clemson. He has the potential to be great.Isaiah Langley is at USC and he's just now cracking the starting lineup his senior year. The same thing can happen to Ngata. There's no guarantees, especially for those that choose the big stage.
Agreed. He has to put in work there. He will be a small fish in a huge pond at Clemson. He has the potential to be great.
I think the way DLSs defense and offensive line got pushed around against Folsom is cause for concern. Depending on how the season plays out, I would mind seeing what Folsom could do in the open, versus seeing another beatdown if DLS goes down there.
But hey that's just my 2 cents.
Fair enough.I'm sure you wouldn't but in order to play in the big boy bowl you need to earn it.
Best of luck against Jesuit tomorrow night.
Isaiah Langley is at USC and he's just now cracking the starting lineup his senior year. The same thing can happen to Ngata. There's no guarantees, especially for those that choose the big stage. I tend to judge players based on how they play in the big games because in essence all D1 recruits from FCS all the way up to the SEC dominate most every Friday night.
This makes sense. They generally run more wide open offenses. We still have a fairly large number of teams running fairly antiquated offenses that dont really translate to the college level.There's a theory that the reason So Cal produces more big time QB's, WR's and DB's than Nor Cal is because on average the level of play and the passing game is more advanced down south.
A few counter points:
1. Yes Folsom gave up more sacks. They threw nearly 3 times as many passes which features a QB drop back. Sack opportunity.
2. DLS threw 11 passes the entire game. Not many opportunities.
3. Yes field position helped a lot. This was a big advantage in my opinion.
4. Folsom line was better on O and on D. Most surprising thing of the night.
5. Joe Ngata was by far the best athlete on the field that night. DLS did do a great job with him. He displayed how good he was when he got into the open field and DESTROYED about 3 DLS defenders before he was tackled. But I agree they did a great job on him.
Overall great game! On to the next!
I don't even know where to start with this response. I will try.Hmm let’s set dls got pressure and created turnovers with only 4 down linemen all game
Folsom shit down dls run game because they put 8-9 in the box all game. That doesn’t mean folsom defense is elite it just means Folsom sold out to stop the run. Dls still only threw the ball 11 times. That’s why I say a balance dls would bear Folsom by 4 tds. Folsom defense will not look as good vs Jesuit because they’ll throw the ball more.
Lastly vs grant Ngata won’t be the most impressive athlete on the field BOOK THAT. So stop with “he’s playing on Sunday” nfl players don’t get held to 60 yards