Sheldon. They play better without Bagley. More like a team. With Bagley they stand and watchbthe Bagley show. Bagley is good. BUT in some ways they [sheldon] are easier to play, with him on court. Sheldon has a lot of talent. A lot. Some known players and guys who if they keep playing will blossom at the JC level.
Someone on here, I think Larry Legend, had the nerve to say Bagley was better than DeMarcus Nelson. GTFOH.
As someone who witnessed Nelson up close and personal. Its not Close. Nelson helped to build that Sheldon program..He put Sheldon on the map. AND it wss sustained by his father, Ron Nelson, who over the years trained most of the players in that program and other parts of Sac. Kids that hoop, coming up in Sac want to go to Sheldon. If not for the Nelson's this wouldnt be the case.
Nelson was/is California's all time leader in points. He was a Mcdonald All.American. He led Sheldon to Norcal finals against De La Salle, where they lost to the Spartans.
He was first early Duke Committee as a SOPHOMORE IN high school. Basketball wise, he was a 6 foot 3 power guard. Kinda a tweener. His only weakness is he didn't have a true position. Not a point. Not a sg. Just a guard. He started basically four years at Duke alongside JJ Reddick.
Nelson had one to two years in NBA. Started as a undrafted Free Agent at point for the Warriors then was on the Chicago Bulls. Now he is overseas and a millionaire playing in Europe [Greece and Italy] And has been last 12 years.
If he would've been in high school today he would've averaged 40 points a game. As he was a killer. I saw him give a state champion St. Mary's [with 3 D1 players] 47 and he missed 9 fts. As a sophomore. He was a walking double double and often times triple double in high school.
I know we sometimes live in the moment. But I wanted to set the record straight on that matter.