http://komonews.com/news/local/superintendent-to-make-statement-on-football-scandal-at-bellevue-high
Read the executive summary of the 78 page report.
Read the executive summary of the 78 page report.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Well...In this day and age of high school football...it just shows what groups will do to win at any cost, this majic transferring from one school to the other doesn't help...I would say in our area we haven't stooped that low yet to do any thing to win. But it may be coming....Huh? Been smoke up there for a while now, may be there is a actual fire. Most disturbing info in that article is the private school issue along with payments to said school from boosters. Other than that nothing that doesn't happen at every public school, fake addresses, boosters giving money...........
Well...In this day and age of high school football...it just shows what groups will do to win at any cost, this majic transferring from one school to the other doesn't help...I would say in our area we haven't stooped that low yet to do any thing to win. But it may be coming....
Seems to be a certain charter that has been accused of fixing enrollenment to play down. Illegal contact with players, as well as flat out recruiting. There has also been rumblings that a certain coaching staff in EBAL in recruiting players off 7 on 7 teams. Oh it's happening folk just don't recognize because they are focus on everything DLS and SoCal.
Who are "they"? I've seen more comments about CVC than DLS or SoCal on these blogs, although a lot of it has been MtnJohn.
What about your position on NCP that the (piss-poor) publics in NorCal should run their program like Bellevue? LOL. Or did you just realize the hypocrisy of such after reading the link above?
The quote was Bellevue, BG, etc, have all said they patterned their program after DLS. And yes there are many piss poor run publics all over the state and country.
Bellevue patterns their program after dLS? Oh my. Of course, you meant just their workout program. (Sanchez was no fool. He went to a private where District rules do not exist.) Goncharoff and his cronies seemed to think they could do the same.
Moving on; so pray tell that EBAL team cherry picking at 7 v 7's you mentioned above.
Captain Obvious says Najee is a very special player. What cracks me up is the load of crap Antioch coaches are selling kids about transferring there to get recruited.
Antioch and 5* RB effect is old news. LOL, not knowing the difference of East Bay and EBAL.
Seems to be a certain charter that has been accused of fixing enrollenment to play down. Illegal contact with players, as well as flat out recruiting. There has also been rumblings that a certain coaching staff in EBAL in recruiting players off 7 on 7 teams. Oh it's happening folk just don't recognize because they are focus on everything DLS and SoCal.
Well...In this day and age of high school football...it just shows what groups will do to win at any cost, this majic transferring from one school to the other doesn't help...I would say in our area we haven't stooped that low yet to do any thing to win. But it may be coming....
IP45, is "troll" your new word? ; > )
But would it really surprise if Cal, Foothill, SR, MV, etc, were guilty at some point as well? I wouldn't be shocked.
Yeah, wouldn't put anything past those publics. Only the privates run clean programs, which is why they are by and large more successful.
LOL B3K- He/she doesn't even know the definition of an internet troll! But let's lend a hand.
An internet troll- "posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community"
It's pretty clear the bias against publics not only from the backslapping of a certain private but posts like (go no further than above in the current thread) "Most disturbing info in that article is the private school issue along with payments to said school from boosters. Other than that nothing that doesn't happen at every public school, fake addresses, boosters giving money." Every public school? Now that's troll-licious (and not a typo.)
Yeah, wouldn't put anything past those publics. Only the privates run clean programs, which is why they are by and large more successful.
is new here (supposedly.) A few years ago most of you know we had a valid conversation about how some (not all) privates have excelled at exploiting loopholes (which cannot be found in publics) to manage their incoming classes. Many of the private supporters willing to have rational thoughts were candid in their admittance of several factors that publics could NOT exploit due to state and district rules. Respect.
Where do WE keep saying those are the ONLY reasons for a particular privates' success? Or in IP's terms, excuses.
Question or statement? Seriously... did you just climb out from under a rock? Research posts from NCP please. Teachers don't do homework for their students.Ok so what are these loop holes they exploit. And frankly you state they arent the only reason for their success. (Translation) So it's the only excuse you feel can't be explained away, the loop holes. Got it.
Question or statement? Seriously... did you just climb out from under a rock? Research posts from NCP please. Teachers don't do homework for their students.
More cryptic 1315 posts .... Odd dude. Just spit it out. In English.
Click on my posts. Find a thread. But since "you have no dog in this fight," (that's your quote, btw) what do you care? Troll away.