Hearing Bradley shut Joe Ngata down. Bradley supposedly the best player on the field next to Badger.
Bradley is really, really good.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hearing Bradley shut Joe Ngata down. Bradley supposedly the best player on the field next to Badger.
Bradley is really, really good.
Joe D needs to write about him rather than anointing the Folsom QB as player of the year - every year. Bradley might be the best skill position player in the area. I'd like to see the press acknowledge him more. He deserves it.
Since he doesn't play for Capital Christian or Folsom, The Bee won't cover him.
And, when you turn it over 4 times, you "didn't play your best"...it had nothing to do with the outstanding defensive play of the opponent.
Great point about Bradley on Ngata. And Bradley is a beast on the offensive side of the ball too.
I though SAC's defense played pretty well all things considered. Holding Folsom to 28 points is no small feat. And they only had 7 at the half. The Dragons problem was on offense. Much of it was due to Folsom's defense, which played pretty well at times. But part of it was SAC's offense left some big plays out on the field.
I also agree with those that said the officiating was poor. I saw lots of really questionable calls on both sides.
As to 28 points, it's far worse than that. It's 14 points. I would not give Folsom's offense credit for the defense's pick-6 or that last score which is typical of Folsom to try to score with little or no time left when there is no question they would win. It's 14 points of offense production - one TD on a 10 yard stop followed by a missed tackle and another on a pump and go after running 10 stops in front of that corner.
Another good callout. I neglected to account for the pick 6 when I made that statement. And you're also right about the late score when the game was essentially over. They really did hold the offense to 14 points for the bulk of the game, which is tremendous against Folsom.
SAC should play a big factor in the D2 playoffs this year.
And you're also right about the late score when the game was essentially over.
Why would that last score not count? Wasn't Folsom only up by 2? If they only got a FG or lost the ball, then Sac would have still had a chance. There's nothing wrong with going for a TD there, especially when I would think Sac's starters were all playing.
You are obsessed with Folsom. All you do is post on Folsom threads. You're a Rocklin guy and we haven't heard a peep about them. Wtf!?I think the point @ILOVETROJANFOOTBALL made that I agreed with is that Folsom was in position to run the clock out. The last score came after the outcome was basically decided. Also, I didn't imply that Folsom was in the wrong to score that TD.
Really OG. You going after TR? TR is one of the most knowledgeable posters on this site if not the most knowledgeable bruh. SMDH on this one.You are obsessed with Folsom. All you do is post on Folsom threads. You're a Rocklin guy and we haven't heard a peep about them. Wtf!?
He is obsessed with Folsom. Always taking indirect jabs. Knowledgeable or Not, that's ridiculous. He knows it tooReally OG. You going after TR? TR is one of the most knowledgeable posters on this site if not the most knowledgeable bruh. SMDH on this one.
I think the point @ILOVETROJANFOOTBALL made that I agreed with is that Folsom was in position to run the clock out. The last score came after the outcome was basically decided. Also, I didn't imply that Folsom was in the wrong to score that TD.