54-35 no matter how you spin it. Choosing who scored and when as an excuse doesn't change the final score (i.e. Folsom vs. DLS this year)
Folsom is 2-0 against San Diego teams in the state bowl games. I am sure you, just as everyone else, doesn't want to see this again. While Folsom won a close game last year as all juniors, I think we can all agree that whoever socal sends to that game this year is likely to get boat raced, which is unfortunate. Why hide some of your best teams in lieu of sending one outstanding team to a bowl and rewarding the tier 3-4 teams? Doesn't make sense to me, but to each their own. Believe me, after this years 1AA game, everyone will be complaining. Watch.
From the Socal perspective- It is ironic that they yell at Folsom, "you don't play anybody!" All while having the opportunity to send one of their own top 5 teams against Folsom to prove their theory. They have declined. I guess yelling fictitious facts is more appealing through message boards and social media. To quote the Grant coach- "beat em!"
Scheduling DLS AT DLS is hunting for squirrels? Very interesting. Most people were applauding the Chaminade scheduling, taking them on in LA, until they found out they weren't going to be as good. Just for arguments sake, I checked out, via your posting history, two teams you regularly post about to compare strength of schedule, in regards to your "hunting squirrels" comment.
Cardinal Newman: 24.7
Rancho Cotate: 23.2
Analy: 5.0
For reference:
DLS: 46.7
Folsom: 38.7
Oaks Christian (small socal private): 37.5
Now, to counter the argument you are already about to type about your schools being "smaller," I would argue that much smaller schools have much tougher schedules (i.e. Oaks Christian).
My point is not to throw stones at others when your water may be much muddier.
