Riordan’s defense on Mitty’s guards was not the problem. I thought they were held in check. It was the help D that allowed the drop off passes. Riordan’s bigs just too inexperienced on this stage. Mitty’s big was tremendous last night. But no big played up on him after he made his first 3. Don’t think he can blow by anyone. Why put in a raw player in for defense on the last play? Why not Rob V and Mor? Mor is young, but he’s 7-1.There you go. You are funny. KINDA crazy talk. He had 8 points and 5 turnovers and 5 assists. Four assists in first have. And I am not knocking him. GREAT player. One of the best guards on west coast. BUT get your facts straight if you are gonna comment. AND BY the way he was uncomfortable the entire game. NOTHING came easy. As a defender only thing one can do is make one uncomfortable. Btw, he got away with a serious push off at the end of game. Which should've gave Riordan the ball. BUT that's how things go.
The Difference in the game was Arish An elephant can see that He had 31. FIRST game at Mitty he had 4 or 6 points. In fact you didnt have to even game plan for him.
You might now. LAST NIGHT...14 in first half, 17 in second including 3 3-point plays. ONE the old fashioned way in paint...Best game he has played since 8th grade aau, when he first came on scene.
AS far as the last play in which Arrish scored. AS it was told tO me. A Crusader defender didn't listen to the coach and rushed over to help on Nigel Burris on the perimeter. Nigel dribbled and
calmly passed the ball to Arrish and the Crusader defender tried to rush back to contest. BUT it was too late. ARRISH scored. Buzzer. Final. Over. Ball game.
You can criticize the coach. Thats Blah blah blah. EASY. BUT if players don't follow direction. Who can you blame?